Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 174562" data-attributes="member: 4134">You won't belief it, but I made it all up all by myself! Think of it that way: Healing spells are supposed to be for divine spellcasters only (Bards don't count, since they're the designated jacks-of-all-trades)! Wizards aren't supposed to be good at healing (they should have few to none spells that can give the caster and his allies hit points back.) Almost all spells on the Wiz list that did such a thing were ferreted out, and the remaining spells have it's limits (vampiric touch works only for the caster and requires a touch attack). So you could describe the ability to heal others without the need of a nearby victim to steal the life force from a class feature for divine spellcasters. And if limited wish should not provide the one time use of a feat for the cost of 300 XP (what will be very expensive very quickly! I'd rather get a rod of metamagic for that!), it should forbid the use of such an imoprtant feature of another class all the more! That was not about you providing your opinion. It was about saying that other people's opinion have no valid basis and that they're worth nothing for everyone else (you didn't use these very words, but the message was quite clear). Saying such things in a forum, where advices are asked for and given, where opinions are shared, where everyone is free to tell his point of view, makes absolutely no sense! I would say the same about your opinion. Please elaborate.</blockquote>

Verification