Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="eriktheguy" data-source="post: 5491897" data-attributes="member: 83662">I have to continue to disagree with any form of limiting at-wills. Other posters have already made the two most important points; at-wills are rarely spammed and at-wills are rarely used in the same way each round.Most characters have been using their at-wills for their entire career. They know at least a dozen ways to execute each one.Many builds depend on spamming at-wills. Twin strikers would be unnecessarily nerfed by this rule. I don't see the necessity for it and I don't like the changes it would make. These two factors add together to make a (imo) bad houserule.I'd also add that any combat in which PCs are forced to use at-wills round after round is one in which they have run out of encounter powers. It's going to be a long combat. Adding additional limitations or penalties to this situation is going to exasperate it and make the fight even longer. This is a bad thing.</blockquote>