Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Paraxis" data-source="post: 6604890" data-attributes="member: 13009">I absolutely dislike this idea is every way, so can't contribute advice but have a question.What do you expect wizards and sorcerers to do during their turn in initiative if they are worried about resource management?When you answer that with &quot;shoot a crossbow or sling a stone&quot;, I ask are you sure that is more fun for the players?&nbsp; Because I can't imagine it is.Because like you say no one will build a caster focused bard, cleric, or druid they will go with the heavy combat focus builds so they can have fun with those classes and not worry about cantrips, but where is the fun for the wizard and sorcerer?Is firebolt honestly that bad?Next question, do you hand out a lot of magic wands and staves because then I guess it wouldn't be noticed much that they can't spam cantrips, but if you do that why not just add &quot;Wand of cantrip X&quot; to the starting equipment of wizards and sorcerers?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Paraxis, post: 6604890, member: 13009"] I absolutely dislike this idea is every way, so can't contribute advice but have a question. What do you expect wizards and sorcerers to do during their turn in initiative if they are worried about resource management? When you answer that with "shoot a crossbow or sling a stone", I ask are you sure that is more fun for the players? Because I can't imagine it is. Because like you say no one will build a caster focused bard, cleric, or druid they will go with the heavy combat focus builds so they can have fun with those classes and not worry about cantrips, but where is the fun for the wizard and sorcerer? Is firebolt honestly that bad? Next question, do you hand out a lot of magic wands and staves because then I guess it wouldn't be noticed much that they can't spam cantrips, but if you do that why not just add "Wand of cantrip X" to the starting equipment of wizards and sorcerers? [/QUOTE]

Verification