Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Limiting magic item use per day and "Milestones" = very bad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silverblade The Ench" data-source="post: 4273336" data-attributes="member: 19083"><p>I think they went a bit overboard on nerfing magic items :/</p><p>I can see why, but I think it's a tad much, however, a more important pair of issues linked to that:</p><p></p><p>I don't like the mechanics for limiting daily magic item use AT ALL. </p><p>I understand there's a desire to stop "Power Gamer X" from having a golf bag of stuff, but even more importantly, it's yet MORE crap to have to worry about in game, ugh! </p><p></p><p>Linking additonal re-use it to "Milestones"...omg...no <em>no </em> <strong>NO</strong>!!! More stuff to track, more stuff I absolutely do not want from 4th ed, I want 4th ed for simplicity as a DM, nor should I expect PCs to have to consider it.</p><p>"Milestones"...gah! maybe it's just me but I find that concept ludicrous, very false and unceccessary complication :/</p><p></p><p>Completing a quest or goal = cool. "Milestones" = totally artificial. Two fights without rest = a "milestone", like...eh, so?</p><p>That's not good for the game, IMHO. Defeating a "leader baddie" ( a miniboss if you wish), that's <em>somehting</em>, or a favourite recurring villain. Two fights is just two fights!! Nothing spectacular in it.</p><p></p><p>If Joe Bob has won 10 items, you know what? Joe Bob deserves to USE 10 items in a day. </p><p>It's also less bloody stuff for a DM to keep track of, it' s bad for the game having the DM force a player to not use an item he's got, for a totally metagaming, non-immersive reason. See what I mean?</p><p></p><p>It's not that</p><p>"<em>Hey Bob, it's only a 1/day item! you've already used it!"</em></p><p>Which is fine.</p><p></p><p>It's</p><p></p><p><em>"hey Bob! rules say you can only use a daily magic item power a total of ONCE a day at your level, so, even though you have three such items, I can't let you use the other two today!"</em></p><p></p><p>No way I'm telling that to my players, that will PO them off hugely. :/</p><p>Likewise saying: </p><p><em>"You hit a milestone, you can use one more daily power!"</em></p><p>is jarring and breaks the immersion cause it's so obviously dumb <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>Needs a major re-think, IMHO. If you've nerfed items hard AND do this to players, that's not cool for the fun and even logic of the game.</p><p>"Milestones" are yet another layer of compelxity to have to track that shouldn't be in a FRPG.</p><p></p><p>Instead, try to prevent "golf bag of items" and swapping stuff around in some other way...like: magic item daily power's won't work unless worn for more than an hour or whatever.</p><p></p><p>I preffer DM common sense to deal with limiting items:</p><p><em>"No, you are not pulling out your <em>second </em> pair of Gauntlets of Butt Scratching just so you can get <em>Mighty Butt Stab </em> again!"</em> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>These are the only things in 4th ed that do feel like "computer gaming" to me, BAD computer gaming. Terribly artifical things put in by bad game design to make it feel liek you've "achieved" something, when you are being given what you should have, <em>free</em>, anyway, and a little "ding" that's got nothing to do with anything. And the CPU can can keep track of that junk, where as it's more harrasment a real person, me, wants to avoid completely when I play D&D.</p><p></p><p>Sigh :/</p><p></p><p>Rest of 4th ed is mostly brilliant IMHO, by the way <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silverblade The Ench, post: 4273336, member: 19083"] I think they went a bit overboard on nerfing magic items :/ I can see why, but I think it's a tad much, however, a more important pair of issues linked to that: I don't like the mechanics for limiting daily magic item use AT ALL. I understand there's a desire to stop "Power Gamer X" from having a golf bag of stuff, but even more importantly, it's yet MORE crap to have to worry about in game, ugh! Linking additonal re-use it to "Milestones"...omg...no [I]no [/I] [B]NO[/B]!!! More stuff to track, more stuff I absolutely do not want from 4th ed, I want 4th ed for simplicity as a DM, nor should I expect PCs to have to consider it. "Milestones"...gah! maybe it's just me but I find that concept ludicrous, very false and unceccessary complication :/ Completing a quest or goal = cool. "Milestones" = totally artificial. Two fights without rest = a "milestone", like...eh, so? That's not good for the game, IMHO. Defeating a "leader baddie" ( a miniboss if you wish), that's [I]somehting[/I], or a favourite recurring villain. Two fights is just two fights!! Nothing spectacular in it. If Joe Bob has won 10 items, you know what? Joe Bob deserves to USE 10 items in a day. It's also less bloody stuff for a DM to keep track of, it' s bad for the game having the DM force a player to not use an item he's got, for a totally metagaming, non-immersive reason. See what I mean? It's not that "[I]Hey Bob, it's only a 1/day item! you've already used it!"[/I] Which is fine. It's [I]"hey Bob! rules say you can only use a daily magic item power a total of ONCE a day at your level, so, even though you have three such items, I can't let you use the other two today!"[/I] No way I'm telling that to my players, that will PO them off hugely. :/ Likewise saying: [I]"You hit a milestone, you can use one more daily power!"[/I] is jarring and breaks the immersion cause it's so obviously dumb :p Needs a major re-think, IMHO. If you've nerfed items hard AND do this to players, that's not cool for the fun and even logic of the game. "Milestones" are yet another layer of compelxity to have to track that shouldn't be in a FRPG. Instead, try to prevent "golf bag of items" and swapping stuff around in some other way...like: magic item daily power's won't work unless worn for more than an hour or whatever. I preffer DM common sense to deal with limiting items: [I]"No, you are not pulling out your [I]second [/I] pair of Gauntlets of Butt Scratching just so you can get [I]Mighty Butt Stab [/I] again!"[/I] :p These are the only things in 4th ed that do feel like "computer gaming" to me, BAD computer gaming. Terribly artifical things put in by bad game design to make it feel liek you've "achieved" something, when you are being given what you should have, [I]free[/I], anyway, and a little "ding" that's got nothing to do with anything. And the CPU can can keep track of that junk, where as it's more harrasment a real person, me, wants to avoid completely when I play D&D. Sigh :/ Rest of 4th ed is mostly brilliant IMHO, by the way :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Limiting magic item use per day and "Milestones" = very bad
Top