Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Limiting Short Rests to 2x/day
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9130112" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>explaining <em>why</em> the LR classes don't want to wait is the part you are avoiding. Are you avoiding it because those why's tend to involve a scenario where ignoring the LR class players attempting to head consequences paints the warlock/SR class player being overruled in a poor light?</p><p></p><p><em><strong>Any</strong></em><strong> possible consequence is generally "part of the RP"</strong>. That <em>Why</em> behind the rest of the group not wanting to is SR critical. Keep going & name some that unmask the villain in your scenario. Why you are avoiding the discussion that would stem from those apparently inconvenient details in order to simply blame LR classes?</p><p></p><p>If the warlock/SR player wants to ignore & dismiss those possible consequences asa thing dismissable under being merely "part of the RP". Doing that might make it easy for the warlock/SR class player to keep avoiding fault by painting LR class players as villains standing in the way of an <em>entitled</em> SR. Ifwhen that is done however the rest of the group is unfairly forced to check the warlock/SR class player's efforts to SR in order to avoid those consequences, it's the warlock/SR class player who is being unreasonable in not checking themselves "as part of the RP". If there is <em>not</em> any consequences the LR class players are trying to avoid "the warlock/SR class player is playing with jerks" or is quite likely deserving of a YTA label in refusing to even acknowledge the consequence.</p><p></p><p>Since you seem unwilling to mention the why</p><p></p><p>[spoiler="Here are a few examples to get you started"]</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">We have buffs running, we are going to carry them forward into the next fight<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">[ispoiler]the Warlock/SR player should be more cognizant of the group they are treating as sidekicks & pace themselves or accept that everyone else at the table <em>also</em> deserve to enjoy their shiny toys. Lets be honest, the warlock/SR class player could have them running to but probably cares less when they can recover the slot used to cast it & more in the rest.[/ispoiler]</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There is a doom clock running, we don't want the [bad thing]* to complete because we were waiting for you to take a rest. The Warlock/SR player literally has powerful at will abilities they can use for this exact kind of situation<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">[ispoiler]A doom clock doesn't exist if players aren't aware of it ahead of time. The Warlock/SR player should have internalized the doom clock and made an effort to pace their expenditures better by doing things like perhaps conserving their SR resources & relying on the powerful at will abilities they have till they reach a major fight or burn through their pool at a more judicious rate.[/ispoiler]</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The warlock/SR PC player is trying to take an excessive number of rests that ultimately feels abusive to their sidekickized allies[/ispoiler]<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">[ispoiler]The warlock/SR class player aren't playing the main character & should be more cognizant of the embarrassment of riches they are demanding[/ispoiler]</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The badguys are getting away and the LR class players don't want to let that happen just so the warlock/SR class player can take a rest.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">[ispoiler]The warlock/SR class player must have been there to notice the bad guys getting away & is being unreasonable expecting the gm to either make the getting away wait for a rest or is being unreasonable expecting the group to allow them to get away just to avoid limiting themselves to their still powerful at-will abilities.[/ispoiler]</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There is no reason the LR players just don't want their characters to wait<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">[ispoiler]LR players at said table: "dude, we explained it to you, we don't want to take this rest because we are trying to avoid this specific consequence that you are ignoring"[/ispoiler]</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The rest of the group are simply jerks<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">[ispoiler]That's so weird to find a full group of jerks... Don't play with jerks[/ispoiler]</li> </ul></li> </ul><p>* princess dies, the ritual completes, the portal opens, the assassination target does their thing & is out of the party's reach or the assassins the party wants to stop kill the target, so on & so forth.[/spoiler]</p><p></p><p>There are probably other reasons why as well, but they seem to be something that you are unwilling to admit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9130112, member: 93670"] explaining [I]why[/I] the LR classes don't want to wait is the part you are avoiding. Are you avoiding it because those why's tend to involve a scenario where ignoring the LR class players attempting to head consequences paints the warlock/SR class player being overruled in a poor light? [I][B]Any[/B][/I][B] possible consequence is generally "part of the RP"[/B]. That [I]Why[/I] behind the rest of the group not wanting to is SR critical. Keep going & name some that unmask the villain in your scenario. Why you are avoiding the discussion that would stem from those apparently inconvenient details in order to simply blame LR classes? If the warlock/SR player wants to ignore & dismiss those possible consequences asa thing dismissable under being merely "part of the RP". Doing that might make it easy for the warlock/SR class player to keep avoiding fault by painting LR class players as villains standing in the way of an [I]entitled[/I] SR. Ifwhen that is done however the rest of the group is unfairly forced to check the warlock/SR class player's efforts to SR in order to avoid those consequences, it's the warlock/SR class player who is being unreasonable in not checking themselves "as part of the RP". If there is [I]not[/I] any consequences the LR class players are trying to avoid "the warlock/SR class player is playing with jerks" or is quite likely deserving of a YTA label in refusing to even acknowledge the consequence. Since you seem unwilling to mention the why [spoiler="Here are a few examples to get you started"] [LIST] [*]We have buffs running, we are going to carry them forward into the next fight [LIST] [*][ispoiler]the Warlock/SR player should be more cognizant of the group they are treating as sidekicks & pace themselves or accept that everyone else at the table [I]also[/I] deserve to enjoy their shiny toys. Lets be honest, the warlock/SR class player could have them running to but probably cares less when they can recover the slot used to cast it & more in the rest.[/ispoiler] [/LIST] [*]There is a doom clock running, we don't want the [bad thing]* to complete because we were waiting for you to take a rest. The Warlock/SR player literally has powerful at will abilities they can use for this exact kind of situation [LIST] [*][ispoiler]A doom clock doesn't exist if players aren't aware of it ahead of time. The Warlock/SR player should have internalized the doom clock and made an effort to pace their expenditures better by doing things like perhaps conserving their SR resources & relying on the powerful at will abilities they have till they reach a major fight or burn through their pool at a more judicious rate.[/ispoiler] [/LIST] [*]The warlock/SR PC player is trying to take an excessive number of rests that ultimately feels abusive to their sidekickized allies[/ispoiler] [LIST] [*][ispoiler]The warlock/SR class player aren't playing the main character & should be more cognizant of the embarrassment of riches they are demanding[/ispoiler] [/LIST] [*]The badguys are getting away and the LR class players don't want to let that happen just so the warlock/SR class player can take a rest. [LIST] [*][ispoiler]The warlock/SR class player must have been there to notice the bad guys getting away & is being unreasonable expecting the gm to either make the getting away wait for a rest or is being unreasonable expecting the group to allow them to get away just to avoid limiting themselves to their still powerful at-will abilities.[/ispoiler] [/LIST] [*]There is no reason the LR players just don't want their characters to wait [LIST] [*][ispoiler]LR players at said table: "dude, we explained it to you, we don't want to take this rest because we are trying to avoid this specific consequence that you are ignoring"[/ispoiler] [/LIST] [*]The rest of the group are simply jerks [LIST] [*][ispoiler]That's so weird to find a full group of jerks... Don't play with jerks[/ispoiler] [/LIST] [/LIST] * princess dies, the ritual completes, the portal opens, the assassination target does their thing & is out of the party's reach or the assassins the party wants to stop kill the target, so on & so forth.[/spoiler] There are probably other reasons why as well, but they seem to be something that you are unwilling to admit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Limiting Short Rests to 2x/day
Top