Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Line of sight, ranged attacks and area attacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OnlineDM" data-source="post: 5362476" data-attributes="member: 90804"><p>I'm still getting up to speed with all of the rules involved in 4e, but I'm getting there. A question came up in a game last night that flummoxed the table a little bit, but I ultimately found the answer in the Rules Compendium. We were all a little bit surprised by that answer, so I thought I'd toss it up here for discussion.</p><p></p><p>First, let me say that I feel pretty good about my understanding of the rules for being hidden. Unless a creature is actually hidden (it successfully makes a Stealth check that beats the opposition's passive Perception - or active Perception if they use an action to search), then everyone on the battlefield knows exactly what square(s) the creature is in. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean you don't know where it is (you can hear it and smell it). Got it. It didn't come up in this particular case because no one tried Stealth.</p><p></p><p>Now here's the actual situation. A wizard cast Stinking Cloud on the battlefield - a 5 by 5 zone that blocks line of sight. What can creatures whose line of sight to one another are blocked by the zone do to each other?</p><p></p><p>I thought that they could shoot ranged attacks at one another with a -5 penalty due to total concealment. Apparently this is correct.</p><p></p><p>I also thought that they could not plop an area power down with an origin square that they couldn't see (within the cloud, opposite side of the cloud, etc.). Apparently this is incorrect.</p><p></p><p>By RAW in the Rules Compendium:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Ranged attacks only require line of effect, not line of sight (though concealment / total concealment penalties apply as appropriate)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Area attacks only require line of effect to the origin square, not line of sight. And naturally there's no penalty to the attack roll as long as the origin square has line of effect to the target - the exploding magic burst doesn't care if it can "see" the target or not</li> </ul><p>Fair enough, I understand the rules now. Everyone at the table was surprised, though. Is the rule that you don't need line of sight to the origin square of an area attack a change, or has it always been that way?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OnlineDM, post: 5362476, member: 90804"] I'm still getting up to speed with all of the rules involved in 4e, but I'm getting there. A question came up in a game last night that flummoxed the table a little bit, but I ultimately found the answer in the Rules Compendium. We were all a little bit surprised by that answer, so I thought I'd toss it up here for discussion. First, let me say that I feel pretty good about my understanding of the rules for being hidden. Unless a creature is actually hidden (it successfully makes a Stealth check that beats the opposition's passive Perception - or active Perception if they use an action to search), then everyone on the battlefield knows exactly what square(s) the creature is in. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean you don't know where it is (you can hear it and smell it). Got it. It didn't come up in this particular case because no one tried Stealth. Now here's the actual situation. A wizard cast Stinking Cloud on the battlefield - a 5 by 5 zone that blocks line of sight. What can creatures whose line of sight to one another are blocked by the zone do to each other? I thought that they could shoot ranged attacks at one another with a -5 penalty due to total concealment. Apparently this is correct. I also thought that they could not plop an area power down with an origin square that they couldn't see (within the cloud, opposite side of the cloud, etc.). Apparently this is incorrect. By RAW in the Rules Compendium: [LIST] [*]Ranged attacks only require line of effect, not line of sight (though concealment / total concealment penalties apply as appropriate) [*]Area attacks only require line of effect to the origin square, not line of sight. And naturally there's no penalty to the attack roll as long as the origin square has line of effect to the target - the exploding magic burst doesn't care if it can "see" the target or not [/LIST] Fair enough, I understand the rules now. Everyone at the table was surprised, though. Is the rule that you don't need line of sight to the origin square of an area attack a change, or has it always been that way? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Line of sight, ranged attacks and area attacks
Top