Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="niklinna" data-source="post: 8451949" data-attributes="member: 71235">I have noticed a few inconsistencies that appear throughout the book. It's very time-consuming to write them up individually, so I have started reporting bugs with a page of &quot;whole book&quot;. Here's an example: The words &quot;self&quot; and &quot;touch&quot; in range expressions (&quot;range of Self&quot;) are sometimes capitalized, sometimes not.I haven't yet noticed any spell names that aren't italicized, but since spell names don't reliably occur in easy-to-find textual constructs (I actually searched back in the pages I've already read and it was not straightforward), I will report any I see going forward individually.I may be guilty of having done this a few times; there can be a fine line between &quot;unclear wording&quot;, &quot;exploitable issue&quot;, and &quot;I don't like that&quot;. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🙇‍♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f647-2642.png" title="Man bowing&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_bowing:" data-shortname=":man_bowing:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> I will try to be more discerning of that line!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="niklinna, post: 8451949, member: 71235"] I have noticed a few inconsistencies that appear throughout the book. It's very time-consuming to write them up individually, so I have started reporting bugs with a page of "whole book". Here's an example: The words "self" and "touch" in range expressions ("range of Self") are sometimes capitalized, sometimes not. I haven't yet noticed any spell names that aren't italicized, but since spell names don't reliably occur in easy-to-find textual constructs (I actually searched back in the pages I've already read and it was not straightforward), I will report any I see going forward individually. I may be guilty of having done this a few times; there can be a fine line between "unclear wording", "exploitable issue", and "I don't like that". 🙇‍♂️ I will try to be more discerning of that line! [/QUOTE]

Verification