Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Linking CHA and Beauty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phindar" data-source="post: 3397161" data-attributes="member: 37198"><p>I'm suggesting that linking beauty to CHA is like saying someone won the Superbowl because of the color of their jersey.</p><p></p><p>Here's the way I am looking at it. We'll call it 3 Possibilities:</p><p></p><p><strong>#1. CHA and Beauty are not linked.</strong> CHA is the force of your personality, your personal magnetism, and your ability to lead. Physical attractiveness is a superficial, a "fluff" consideration, and can't be tied directly back to stats. </p><p></p><p><strong>#2. CHA and Beauty are linked.</strong> As the sole stat that mentions physical attractiveness in the book, CHA determines physical attractiveness. Low CHA characters are ugly, High CHA characters are beautiful. </p><p></p><p><strong>#3. CHA and Beauty are related, but they are also separate.</strong> This one I'm a little fuzzy on, because it seems paradoxical, but enough people have voted for it that I feel compelled to put it on the list. High CHA ugly people and Low CHA beautiful people are possible, that the various parts of CHA blend together to the final score, and a deficiency in one area can be made up by being exceptional in another area. </p><p></p><p><strong>#1</strong> is the opinion I have been pushing so far. <strong>#2</strong> is the idea put forth by the RAW, but its also the easiest to discount, because so many of the conclusions you draw from it are ridiculous. (That all charismatic people are prettier, that you have to be pretty to be charismatic, that physical beauty determines Turn Attempts per day, and so on.) </p><p></p><p><strong>#3</strong> seems to be the idea you have put forth, but I have the same problem with <strong>#3</strong> that I have with <strong>#2</strong> (that physical attractiveness affects a Sorcerer's ability to cast, or that a Sorcerer's ability to cast affects his attractiveness) as I see physical attractiveness as a cosmetic consideration, and a particularly useless one in a game with 100's of creatures with radically different standards of beauty, plus the fact that <strong>#3</strong> is contradictory. If CHA and Beauty are linked sometimes and completely separate sometimes, what's the point in saying they are linked? (If one character is beautiful because of his High CHA, and another has a Low Charisma and is beautiful, and a third has a High CHA and is ugly, wouldn't the logical conclusion be that CHA is not linked the beauty?)</p><p></p><p></p><p>My problem with this is that the beautiful woman with the okay personality and the ugly woman with the amazing personality both get the same number of bonus spells per day as a Sorcerer. One gets her spells from having a forceful personality, the other, from being hot. This is a bridge too far for my suspension of disbelief.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phindar, post: 3397161, member: 37198"] I'm suggesting that linking beauty to CHA is like saying someone won the Superbowl because of the color of their jersey. Here's the way I am looking at it. We'll call it 3 Possibilities: [b]#1. CHA and Beauty are not linked.[/b] CHA is the force of your personality, your personal magnetism, and your ability to lead. Physical attractiveness is a superficial, a "fluff" consideration, and can't be tied directly back to stats. [b]#2. CHA and Beauty are linked.[/b] As the sole stat that mentions physical attractiveness in the book, CHA determines physical attractiveness. Low CHA characters are ugly, High CHA characters are beautiful. [b]#3. CHA and Beauty are related, but they are also separate.[/b] This one I'm a little fuzzy on, because it seems paradoxical, but enough people have voted for it that I feel compelled to put it on the list. High CHA ugly people and Low CHA beautiful people are possible, that the various parts of CHA blend together to the final score, and a deficiency in one area can be made up by being exceptional in another area. [b]#1[/b] is the opinion I have been pushing so far. [b]#2[/b] is the idea put forth by the RAW, but its also the easiest to discount, because so many of the conclusions you draw from it are ridiculous. (That all charismatic people are prettier, that you have to be pretty to be charismatic, that physical beauty determines Turn Attempts per day, and so on.) [b]#3[/b] seems to be the idea you have put forth, but I have the same problem with [b]#3[/b] that I have with [b]#2[/b] (that physical attractiveness affects a Sorcerer's ability to cast, or that a Sorcerer's ability to cast affects his attractiveness) as I see physical attractiveness as a cosmetic consideration, and a particularly useless one in a game with 100's of creatures with radically different standards of beauty, plus the fact that [b]#3[/b] is contradictory. If CHA and Beauty are linked sometimes and completely separate sometimes, what's the point in saying they are linked? (If one character is beautiful because of his High CHA, and another has a Low Charisma and is beautiful, and a third has a High CHA and is ugly, wouldn't the logical conclusion be that CHA is not linked the beauty?) My problem with this is that the beautiful woman with the okay personality and the ugly woman with the amazing personality both get the same number of bonus spells per day as a Sorcerer. One gets her spells from having a forceful personality, the other, from being hot. This is a bridge too far for my suspension of disbelief. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Linking CHA and Beauty
Top