Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Khaalis" data-source="post: 1391332" data-attributes="member: 2167">This is an interesting version. It is relatively simple, I agree, though a little too Wizard-like for my taste still. But that’s JMHO. But anyway, I’m not here to criticize, everyone knows my standpoint. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Just a few comments…I notice that this is the same mechanic as the Battle Sorcerer from UA. Then re-adding that spell as a domain spell. I have seen this suggested on my own thread, but I get the impression that most people feel that the sorcerer’s known spells are already far too restrictive. What made you decide to restrict it even more?I agree that the familiar is too Wizard-centric, but I didn’t want to get into re-writing the core familiar mechanic. Yours is more similar to an Animal Companion/Familiar crossover. What brought you to this version?  Also, why do you keep the Familiar?  I ask this question from a literary point of view. Personally, I have never much liked the Wizard familiar to begin with as it is far too stereotypical of the Judeo-Christian view of Witchcraft and the typical Black Cat. Most of the iconic wizards in literature don’t really have familiars.   I just like to get people’s views on this.What source does this come from? I am very interested in this but don’t remember seeing it. I am assuming BoEM I or II?  I may have to use this…What do you mean by not a spell progression in a PrC? I am kind of confused on this. This is a core functionality of the Sorcerer’s Known Spell acquisition. Just curious on the logic of this one.Thanks and Good Luck!</blockquote>

Verification