Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
List of broken PrCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 921419" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Pax: Well, that is the theory at least, but in practice it doesn't much work that way.</p><p></p><p>If the entry requirements are themselves pretty much something you might have taken anyway, or at the least something you can get a good benifit from taking without sacrificing something of great importance, then having requirements aren't much of a balancing factor at all.</p><p></p><p>'Ergo', indeed. Exactly what is the basis of the conclusion that if only some people can take it perforce it must give you more advantages than training that anyone could experience? That is a design decision, not something that is forced on you by the self-evident logic of it.</p><p></p><p>And as far as specialization goes, specializing is itself always a means of improving ones power in an RPG (and to a certain extent in any resource allocation game and life in general). The specialist benifits from having some defence or attack of such extraordinary power that challenges he expects to encounter cannot resist or overcome it. He mitigates his weaknesses by using tactics to force his opponents to fight the battles that he wants to fight. The generalist has a much harder time, for while he doesn't have the weaknesses of the specialist - he almost certainly will be disadvantaged in something versus everything he faces. Even the party structure breaksdown along lines of specialization. Which party is more capable, the one with a 8th level fighter, 8th level rogue, 8th level cleric, 8th level wizard, or the party with 4 2nd level fighters/2nd level rogues/2nd level clerics/2nd level wizards? So it is not like you are giving up anything by specializing, the more so because in the case of the sort of PrC's that are actually taken they are specializations that PC's would have taken anyway whether PrC's existed or not.</p><p></p><p>Basically, if you have a problem with unbalanced PrC's throw out pretty much all of them with Fighter BAB progression or full caster spell progression. The 'broken' list is a sublist of that list and probably starts with OotBI, Templar, Red Wizard, Archmage, Frenzied Beserker, Weapon Master...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 921419, member: 4937"] Pax: Well, that is the theory at least, but in practice it doesn't much work that way. If the entry requirements are themselves pretty much something you might have taken anyway, or at the least something you can get a good benifit from taking without sacrificing something of great importance, then having requirements aren't much of a balancing factor at all. 'Ergo', indeed. Exactly what is the basis of the conclusion that if only some people can take it perforce it must give you more advantages than training that anyone could experience? That is a design decision, not something that is forced on you by the self-evident logic of it. And as far as specialization goes, specializing is itself always a means of improving ones power in an RPG (and to a certain extent in any resource allocation game and life in general). The specialist benifits from having some defence or attack of such extraordinary power that challenges he expects to encounter cannot resist or overcome it. He mitigates his weaknesses by using tactics to force his opponents to fight the battles that he wants to fight. The generalist has a much harder time, for while he doesn't have the weaknesses of the specialist - he almost certainly will be disadvantaged in something versus everything he faces. Even the party structure breaksdown along lines of specialization. Which party is more capable, the one with a 8th level fighter, 8th level rogue, 8th level cleric, 8th level wizard, or the party with 4 2nd level fighters/2nd level rogues/2nd level clerics/2nd level wizards? So it is not like you are giving up anything by specializing, the more so because in the case of the sort of PrC's that are actually taken they are specializations that PC's would have taken anyway whether PrC's existed or not. Basically, if you have a problem with unbalanced PrC's throw out pretty much all of them with Fighter BAB progression or full caster spell progression. The 'broken' list is a sublist of that list and probably starts with OotBI, Templar, Red Wizard, Archmage, Frenzied Beserker, Weapon Master... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
List of broken PrCs
Top