Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7010130" data-attributes="member: 7006">You mean wanting to stop the 17 people caring about your setting.&nbsp; The 17 people for whom having Current Year up-to-date &quot;setting canon&quot; actually matters, and for whom the previous 30 years worth of Forgotten Realms setting material isn't good enough.&nbsp; For those 17 people, yeah, Mike and the gang have left them out to dry.&nbsp; But I have a feeling they're probably okay with it.&nbsp; They can't save everyone with every edition, so they take the path that'll save the most they can.If you want to try and argue that WotC is worse off now with how they're running the Realms like&nbsp; [MENTION=6776548]Corpsetaker[/MENTION] tries to do... best of luck with that.&nbsp; But the rest of us know that it ain't true.&nbsp; D&amp;D is just as prosperous (if not more) than ever, and that's even with them changing how they handle the &quot;canon&quot; of the setting.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7010130, member: 7006"] You mean wanting to stop the 17 people caring about your setting. The 17 people for whom having Current Year up-to-date "setting canon" actually matters, and for whom the previous 30 years worth of Forgotten Realms setting material isn't good enough. For those 17 people, yeah, Mike and the gang have left them out to dry. But I have a feeling they're probably okay with it. They can't save everyone with every edition, so they take the path that'll save the most they can. If you want to try and argue that WotC is worse off now with how they're running the Realms like [MENTION=6776548]Corpsetaker[/MENTION] tries to do... best of luck with that. But the rest of us know that it ain't true. D&D is just as prosperous (if not more) than ever, and that's even with them changing how they handle the "canon" of the setting. [/QUOTE]

Verification