Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Listened to latest "Lore you should know" and......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MNblockhead" data-source="post: 7010156" data-attributes="member: 6796661"><p>But the FR is used as the setting for stories taking place in so many different media. In the last Lore You Should Know they discussed the difficulty in determining what is canon in this environment. You have the adventure paths and setting books, the novels, the streamed games like Acquisitions Incorporated, and--soon--a movie. </p><p></p><p>To capture all of that and put it into a setting book...well, that book would have to be HUGE. Few DMs are going to want to take it on. 5e has been a great success in bringing old players like myself back into the fold and also in attracting a new generation. It does this because it offers a solid set of modern, streamlined rules that are pretty easy to pickup, yet retain an old-school flavor, and then you can buy adventure paths that make it easy to prep and play a 6-8 month campaign. </p><p></p><p>Throwing something as weighty as the realms into this doesn't seem like a good fit. I realize it would be a lot more work to create a new realm for 5e, but are there not other realms they could have brought back that would come with less baggage? Greyhawk probably would suffer from the same issue. </p><p></p><p>Seems to me that they wanted it both ways. They want a well-fleshed out campaign world with lots of cross-marketing opportunities, but at the same time, they decided to hit the reset button to force a large, well-rounded Realms peg into a tight 5e square and then say, "don't worry about making it fit, just play with it however you want!"</p><p></p><p>Which, ultimately, is what i'll do if I ever play with any of the APs set in the Realms. I will ignore nearly everything outside of the AP book and make up the rest as I need to. I would never DM for a Adventurer's League game because there is no way I'm going to be able to put in the time to know the FR as well as a fan who might play in my game. </p><p></p><p>This issue is another reason why I'm turned off by Star Wars, Star Trek, Fire Fly, LoTR, and Doctor Who rpgs. I would gladly play in them, but would never DM them. </p><p></p><p>This is also why I like to use home-brew campaigns--I don't have get into arguments about Canon with my players when it is my own world. Yeah, I probably put in as much or more work making my own world than just learning enough about FR to run games in it, but the former is a fun act of creation. The later feels like homework.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MNblockhead, post: 7010156, member: 6796661"] But the FR is used as the setting for stories taking place in so many different media. In the last Lore You Should Know they discussed the difficulty in determining what is canon in this environment. You have the adventure paths and setting books, the novels, the streamed games like Acquisitions Incorporated, and--soon--a movie. To capture all of that and put it into a setting book...well, that book would have to be HUGE. Few DMs are going to want to take it on. 5e has been a great success in bringing old players like myself back into the fold and also in attracting a new generation. It does this because it offers a solid set of modern, streamlined rules that are pretty easy to pickup, yet retain an old-school flavor, and then you can buy adventure paths that make it easy to prep and play a 6-8 month campaign. Throwing something as weighty as the realms into this doesn't seem like a good fit. I realize it would be a lot more work to create a new realm for 5e, but are there not other realms they could have brought back that would come with less baggage? Greyhawk probably would suffer from the same issue. Seems to me that they wanted it both ways. They want a well-fleshed out campaign world with lots of cross-marketing opportunities, but at the same time, they decided to hit the reset button to force a large, well-rounded Realms peg into a tight 5e square and then say, "don't worry about making it fit, just play with it however you want!" Which, ultimately, is what i'll do if I ever play with any of the APs set in the Realms. I will ignore nearly everything outside of the AP book and make up the rest as I need to. I would never DM for a Adventurer's League game because there is no way I'm going to be able to put in the time to know the FR as well as a fan who might play in my game. This issue is another reason why I'm turned off by Star Wars, Star Trek, Fire Fly, LoTR, and Doctor Who rpgs. I would gladly play in them, but would never DM them. This is also why I like to use home-brew campaigns--I don't have get into arguments about Canon with my players when it is my own world. Yeah, I probably put in as much or more work making my own world than just learning enough about FR to run games in it, but the former is a fun act of creation. The later feels like homework. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Listened to latest "Lore you should know" and......
Top