Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Litany of 3.5 rules questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="argo" data-source="post: 1650460" data-attributes="member: 5752"><p>He has a 50% chance to stay in the saddle if it is a normal saddle or a 75% chance if it is a military saddle. See p 157 PHB.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The player keeps his origional inititative, if that means that he looses actions then he looses actions. The only way to change your intitative count is to use the delay or ready Special Initiative Actions and in order to do that you must be conscious and able to take an action on your turn. See p 160 PHB</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, a character can tumble one half his speed as part of normal movement without provoking an AoO for a DC 15 tumble check or can tumble his full speed without provoking an AoO for a DC 25 tumble check (see <strong>Accelerated Tumbling</strong> p 84 PHB). A player can crawl on the ground 5' as a move action which draws an AoO. (see <strong>crawling</strong> p 142 PHB) Since you cannot move one half of 5' in the grid system you can then tumble 5' on the ground without provoking an AoO as a move action with a DC 25 tumble check. That then leaves you a move action to stand up (assuming the opponent doesnt' have reach. A common house rule is that a DC 35 tumble check will allow you to stand up as a free action that does not provoke an AoO but that is not RAW.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No he takes exactly the same ammount of dammage. However, note that a conscious character who is able to take actions can, as a response to falling, make a DC 15 tumble check to treat a fall as if it were 10 feet shorter, see p 84 PHB. In addition, a characer who elects to jump (as opposed to falling) can also make a DC 15 jump check to treat the fall as if it were another 10 feet shorter, see p 77 PHB. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Why yes, yes there is: </p><p>errata: <a href="http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20040125a" target="_blank">http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20040125a</a></p><p>FAQ: <a href="http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20030221a" target="_blank">http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20030221a</a></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes you can. If your mount takes a double move you take a -4 penalty, if your mount is running (4x move) you take a -8 penalty. Since your question is "a warhorse, who is attacking" I will assume that you mean a war-trained mount (as opposed to a non-trained mount, which is different) whom you have used a DC 5 ride check (as a free action) to "guide with your knees" leaving both you hands free and a DC 10 ride check (as a free action) to "fight with warhorse" to direct the mount to either take a single move action and attack at the end of the move or take a full round attack while staying in place. Either way you can take a full round attack or a single attack and a move action of your own. If you directed the mount to move and attack you would fire while the mount is moving and are assumed to make all the shots from a point halfway through the move (for purposes of range penalties, etc) if anyone was threatening any space occupied by your mount at that point halfway through the move then you would indeed provoke an AoO. If you directed your mount to make a full round attack then you do not move at all this turn and you make all your shots from where your mount is standing, if anyone threatens any space occupied by your mount durring this round then you again provoke an AoO. See <strong>Ride skill</strong> p 80 PHB and <strong>Mounted Combat</strong> p 156 PHB.</p><p></p><p></p><p>AFAIK there is no direct answer to this question. The default assumption of the rules is that only one rider will be riding the mount in battle. My gut would say yes but add a -5 penalty to all the ride checks of the person controling the mount. Also make sure that the horse is not encumbered or else that will reduce its speed, see table 6-9 p 164 PHB for a horse's carrying load.</p><p></p><p></p><p>A horse and rider (by definition, the person directing the mount and making the related Ride checks) both act on the same initiative count, the mount using its action to move and the rider dividing up his action as dictated by the special mounted combat rules. See p 157 PHB. A passenger acts on his own initiative count. He may use the delay Special Initiative Action to change his initiative but he cannot act "simultaneously" as the horse/rider. Even if he changes his initiative count to be the same as the horse/rider he must still take his entire turn either before or after the horse/rider take their actions (thus he acts either where the horse was standing before the horse's turn or where it is standing after but not as some point in the middle of the move as was the case with the mounted archer who was also the rider in your earlier question). The passenger may also use the ready Special Initative Action to ready a standard action, this action can indeed interupt someone elses action so in that case the passanger can take a single standard action durring the horse/rider's turn. He can use his move action before taking the ready action however he likes but again he must make that move action at whatever point the mount is occupying before the mount's move. In this even the passanger's initative count becomes the same count as whomever triggered teh ready action and the passanger goes before that person. See p 160 PHB.</p><p></p><p>I think an example is in order for that last one. Say a horse has a rider (an archer) and a passanger (with a longsword). Every round the archer/rider directs the mount to take a double move past an opponent (who, for the sake of the example we will say does not move) while making a full-round attack with his bow. The archer gets to make his full-attack at a point halfway through his mount's move and all the movement and attacking happen on the same initative count (the rider's). The passanger has an initative count higher than the rider's and since the mount is not near the enemy either at the beginning or end of the mount's move there is nothing the passanger can do. Even if he delay's to the start of the rider's init he would still have to make his full turn before the horse and rider did anything. If he delay's until after the rider's init he would have to make his full turn after the horse and rider performed all their actions. However, the passanger may use his standard action to ready an action to "attack the enemy when we ride past". In this case he gets one attack (a standard action) and his init becomes the same as the rider's but he continues to act before the rider, thus he may repeat this action every round if he wishes. Note that a passenger must make ride checks to "guide with knees" if he wishes to use two hands, "stay in saddle" to avoid falling when he takes damage, "soft fall" if he falls and "fast mount or dismount" to get on or off but not to perform any other action nor should he be allowed to use any mounted feats since he is not controling the horse. Also note that a horse can only wear one saddle and whomever isn't ridding in the saddle takes a -5 penalty for ridding bareback.</p><p></p><p>Hope that helps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="argo, post: 1650460, member: 5752"] He has a 50% chance to stay in the saddle if it is a normal saddle or a 75% chance if it is a military saddle. See p 157 PHB. The player keeps his origional inititative, if that means that he looses actions then he looses actions. The only way to change your intitative count is to use the delay or ready Special Initiative Actions and in order to do that you must be conscious and able to take an action on your turn. See p 160 PHB Yes, a character can tumble one half his speed as part of normal movement without provoking an AoO for a DC 15 tumble check or can tumble his full speed without provoking an AoO for a DC 25 tumble check (see [b]Accelerated Tumbling[/b] p 84 PHB). A player can crawl on the ground 5' as a move action which draws an AoO. (see [b]crawling[/b] p 142 PHB) Since you cannot move one half of 5' in the grid system you can then tumble 5' on the ground without provoking an AoO as a move action with a DC 25 tumble check. That then leaves you a move action to stand up (assuming the opponent doesnt' have reach. A common house rule is that a DC 35 tumble check will allow you to stand up as a free action that does not provoke an AoO but that is not RAW. No he takes exactly the same ammount of dammage. However, note that a conscious character who is able to take actions can, as a response to falling, make a DC 15 tumble check to treat a fall as if it were 10 feet shorter, see p 84 PHB. In addition, a characer who elects to jump (as opposed to falling) can also make a DC 15 jump check to treat the fall as if it were another 10 feet shorter, see p 77 PHB. Why yes, yes there is: errata: [url]http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20040125a[/url] FAQ: [url]http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20030221a[/url] Yes you can. If your mount takes a double move you take a -4 penalty, if your mount is running (4x move) you take a -8 penalty. Since your question is "a warhorse, who is attacking" I will assume that you mean a war-trained mount (as opposed to a non-trained mount, which is different) whom you have used a DC 5 ride check (as a free action) to "guide with your knees" leaving both you hands free and a DC 10 ride check (as a free action) to "fight with warhorse" to direct the mount to either take a single move action and attack at the end of the move or take a full round attack while staying in place. Either way you can take a full round attack or a single attack and a move action of your own. If you directed the mount to move and attack you would fire while the mount is moving and are assumed to make all the shots from a point halfway through the move (for purposes of range penalties, etc) if anyone was threatening any space occupied by your mount at that point halfway through the move then you would indeed provoke an AoO. If you directed your mount to make a full round attack then you do not move at all this turn and you make all your shots from where your mount is standing, if anyone threatens any space occupied by your mount durring this round then you again provoke an AoO. See [b]Ride skill[/b] p 80 PHB and [b]Mounted Combat[/b] p 156 PHB. AFAIK there is no direct answer to this question. The default assumption of the rules is that only one rider will be riding the mount in battle. My gut would say yes but add a -5 penalty to all the ride checks of the person controling the mount. Also make sure that the horse is not encumbered or else that will reduce its speed, see table 6-9 p 164 PHB for a horse's carrying load. A horse and rider (by definition, the person directing the mount and making the related Ride checks) both act on the same initiative count, the mount using its action to move and the rider dividing up his action as dictated by the special mounted combat rules. See p 157 PHB. A passenger acts on his own initiative count. He may use the delay Special Initiative Action to change his initiative but he cannot act "simultaneously" as the horse/rider. Even if he changes his initiative count to be the same as the horse/rider he must still take his entire turn either before or after the horse/rider take their actions (thus he acts either where the horse was standing before the horse's turn or where it is standing after but not as some point in the middle of the move as was the case with the mounted archer who was also the rider in your earlier question). The passenger may also use the ready Special Initative Action to ready a standard action, this action can indeed interupt someone elses action so in that case the passanger can take a single standard action durring the horse/rider's turn. He can use his move action before taking the ready action however he likes but again he must make that move action at whatever point the mount is occupying before the mount's move. In this even the passanger's initative count becomes the same count as whomever triggered teh ready action and the passanger goes before that person. See p 160 PHB. I think an example is in order for that last one. Say a horse has a rider (an archer) and a passanger (with a longsword). Every round the archer/rider directs the mount to take a double move past an opponent (who, for the sake of the example we will say does not move) while making a full-round attack with his bow. The archer gets to make his full-attack at a point halfway through his mount's move and all the movement and attacking happen on the same initative count (the rider's). The passanger has an initative count higher than the rider's and since the mount is not near the enemy either at the beginning or end of the mount's move there is nothing the passanger can do. Even if he delay's to the start of the rider's init he would still have to make his full turn before the horse and rider did anything. If he delay's until after the rider's init he would have to make his full turn after the horse and rider performed all their actions. However, the passanger may use his standard action to ready an action to "attack the enemy when we ride past". In this case he gets one attack (a standard action) and his init becomes the same as the rider's but he continues to act before the rider, thus he may repeat this action every round if he wishes. Note that a passenger must make ride checks to "guide with knees" if he wishes to use two hands, "stay in saddle" to avoid falling when he takes damage, "soft fall" if he falls and "fast mount or dismount" to get on or off but not to perform any other action nor should he be allowed to use any mounted feats since he is not controling the horse. Also note that a horse can only wear one saddle and whomever isn't ridding in the saddle takes a -5 penalty for ridding bareback. Hope that helps. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Litany of 3.5 rules questions
Top