Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Graf" data-source="post: 4461886" data-attributes="member: 3087">We are ready to start now. It's a setting in progress, the wikis aren't perfect, there will probably be confusion about creating characters but honestly we're done.We actually adopted a system a while back that said "for things the facilitators think are non-controversial 4 "yeas" and no "nays" means it passes.There have been lots of "yea" like posts and nothing that resembles a "nay".Actually I think there is a bit of a middle ground. When you submit the adventure you should mention key NPCs; so if the captain is new then we have a chance to see him "in advance".If he matches the setting then he's all well and good, and we'll probably put something up about him on the wiki.If you say "the captain of the guard is actually based around my first character, and he's the 13th god, who's just pretending to be mortal and his pet dog is actually the oldest wisest most powerful dragon ever and..."Then the judges will have a chance to talk to you about that first.If it is a big change, but the judges think its such a good story we should think about doing it (say a flying castle appears over the skies of Daunton) then we can make a proposal and discuss it.It actually seems like the only sane way to do things.I think rgladwell has it right.We will do that.The character creation page just got a forum post because we can use sblocks and I can't do that on the wiki.(And I panicked a bit when I heard that Cov is going away for a while -- I can do board posts a lot faster than wiki pages).</blockquote>

Verification