Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ki11erDM" data-source="post: 6178165" data-attributes="member: 58179">I really don’t get the deal with everyone and the Mage class.&nbsp; Sure I can see calling it Magic-User but the rest of the arguments just sound hollow to me.&nbsp; Mage = a person poorly trained in arms and armor, who is well versed in the arcane arts, and has low hit points.&nbsp; All the subclasses discussed fall under that umbrella with no issue.&nbsp; As for the Fighter vs Barbarian thing:&nbsp; Fighter = a person well versed in arms and armor, who is very skilled in a melee, and has good hit points.&nbsp; All subclasses must fall into this, barbarians clearly do not.&nbsp; Barbarian = a person who knows how to use a few weapons with brute force and furry, his furry carries him through a melee, and he relies on adrenalin instead of armor.&nbsp; &nbsp; As for the Monk?&nbsp; I would like to just delete them from the history of D&amp;D… hehe.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ki11erDM, post: 6178165, member: 58179"] I really don’t get the deal with everyone and the Mage class. Sure I can see calling it Magic-User but the rest of the arguments just sound hollow to me. Mage = a person poorly trained in arms and armor, who is well versed in the arcane arts, and has low hit points. All the subclasses discussed fall under that umbrella with no issue. As for the Fighter vs Barbarian thing: Fighter = a person well versed in arms and armor, who is very skilled in a melee, and has good hit points. All subclasses must fall into this, barbarians clearly do not. Barbarian = a person who knows how to use a few weapons with brute force and furry, his furry carries him through a melee, and he relies on adrenalin instead of armor. As for the Monk? I would like to just delete them from the history of D&D… hehe. [/QUOTE]

Verification