Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jacob Lewis" data-source="post: 9696446" data-attributes="member: 6667921">You're definitely on the right track. Honestly, if what you're doing is working for you now, then you're where you need to be.That said, I’ve taken it a few steps further by formatting information in a way that more closely resembles machine-readable structures—something like JSON. It’s not code, but it follows the same principles: clean labels, consistent structure, and tightly scoped data. The reason this works so well is because LLMs are trained on structured data formats like this. Parsing patterns, fields, and schemas is core to how they function.Think of it this way: we’re not writing for a human reader anymore. We’re writing for the model itself. So speaking in its “native language”—structured, minimal, predictable—makes it easier for it to recall and use the information correctly.If you're curious what that looks like, I converted your character sheet into a format I typically use when prepping for LLM-driven sessions. Just be aware, my LLMs are already trained to understand and work with this kind of format. They know it's meant for them, not me. So don’t expect magic if you just paste it in without context—but I'd genuinely be curious to see how yours handles it without additional instruction.</blockquote>