Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
LLMs as a GM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jacob Lewis" data-source="post: 9698241" data-attributes="member: 6667921"><p>I appreciate the range of perspectives here, though I do think we’ve drifted a bit from the main thread—how LLMs are being used as game masters in practice. That said, I think it’s worth addressing some of the broader perceptions, since misconceptions can easily shape public opinion before people have a chance to explore and form their own views.</p><p></p><p>Most people don’t have clear, reliable guidance on how to use LLMs. They’re handed the tool with little to no instruction, and their experience is shaped almost entirely by whatever assumptions, narratives, or hype they've already absorbed. Some get good results. Others don’t. And then those mixed results become the new input for public discourse—articles, forum posts, videos—all reinforcing a kind of consensus about what these tools are supposed to be.</p><p></p><p>What keeps standing out to me is that most of the time, the results we get from these tools reflect more about the user than the system itself. The way we prompt, the structure we give, the assumptions we carry in—those all shape the output. And yet, the public conversation often treats the output as if it reveals something essential about the model, not about the interaction.</p><p></p><p>What’s ironic is that this human feedback loop—the way narratives form, get repeated, and reinforce themselves—mirrors many of the concerns people raise about AI: that it recycles dominant patterns, amplifies bias, resists nuance, and flattens complexity. We talk about LLMs doing this, but public discourse does it just as reliably. And without realizing it, that cycle ends up training expectations more than the systems do.</p><p></p><p>So I’m less interested in debating autonomy or intelligence, and more focused on how people are actually using these tools—with intent, structure, and awareness—and what’s been learned from those experiences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jacob Lewis, post: 9698241, member: 6667921"] I appreciate the range of perspectives here, though I do think we’ve drifted a bit from the main thread—how LLMs are being used as game masters in practice. That said, I think it’s worth addressing some of the broader perceptions, since misconceptions can easily shape public opinion before people have a chance to explore and form their own views. Most people don’t have clear, reliable guidance on how to use LLMs. They’re handed the tool with little to no instruction, and their experience is shaped almost entirely by whatever assumptions, narratives, or hype they've already absorbed. Some get good results. Others don’t. And then those mixed results become the new input for public discourse—articles, forum posts, videos—all reinforcing a kind of consensus about what these tools are supposed to be. What keeps standing out to me is that most of the time, the results we get from these tools reflect more about the user than the system itself. The way we prompt, the structure we give, the assumptions we carry in—those all shape the output. And yet, the public conversation often treats the output as if it reveals something essential about the model, not about the interaction. What’s ironic is that this human feedback loop—the way narratives form, get repeated, and reinforce themselves—mirrors many of the concerns people raise about AI: that it recycles dominant patterns, amplifies bias, resists nuance, and flattens complexity. We talk about LLMs doing this, but public discourse does it just as reliably. And without realizing it, that cycle ends up training expectations more than the systems do. So I’m less interested in debating autonomy or intelligence, and more focused on how people are actually using these tools—with intent, structure, and awareness—and what’s been learned from those experiences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
LLMs as a GM
Top