Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
LN rogue using poison?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Apok" data-source="post: 571541" data-attributes="member: 1969"><p>I think the difference between the three is an implied sense of heroism, honor, and self-defense. What do I mean by this?</p><p></p><p>In the case of the charging paladin, it is heroic for him to charge into mortal danger, risking his own life to slay those who could very easily slay him in return. To fight one's enemy face-to-face is considered the "honorable" thing to do and is therefore not frowned upon. The sorcerer puts himself at risk by being on a battlefield for he is weak and easily hurt without his magic to protect him. He risks almost as much as the noble Paladin. In both cases, the enemy can also see the danger and face it. They know what's coming and they can choose to fight or flee as they see fit.</p><p></p><p>The problem with the poison using rogue is that the enemy will never see him (if he's competant at all) and won't be able to defend themselves nor recognize the threat before it's too late. Also, the use of poison is not considered to be brave, noble, honorable or in any way self-sacrificing. It is "the cowards weapon" and that is, IMO, the reason why poison use is typically frowned upon. </p><p></p><p>Now, from a completely pragmatic point of view, dead is dead and the rest is irrelevant. The means with which you destroy the invading Orc horde, weather through glorious battle or dark trickery, doesn't mean squat as long as you get the same results. However, and I've stated this before, in the D&D alignment system Good does not equal Pragmatic. Therefore, the use of poison which is highly pragmatic is not considered a Good act. Neutral, sure. Evil, definitely. As far as the Lawful part is concerned, it depends entirely on your character. If he has no personal code preventing him from using poisons then great. Just beause you are Lawful doesn't mean you obey the laws of your society, it just means that you strictly follow some kind of personal code.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Apok, post: 571541, member: 1969"] I think the difference between the three is an implied sense of heroism, honor, and self-defense. What do I mean by this? In the case of the charging paladin, it is heroic for him to charge into mortal danger, risking his own life to slay those who could very easily slay him in return. To fight one's enemy face-to-face is considered the "honorable" thing to do and is therefore not frowned upon. The sorcerer puts himself at risk by being on a battlefield for he is weak and easily hurt without his magic to protect him. He risks almost as much as the noble Paladin. In both cases, the enemy can also see the danger and face it. They know what's coming and they can choose to fight or flee as they see fit. The problem with the poison using rogue is that the enemy will never see him (if he's competant at all) and won't be able to defend themselves nor recognize the threat before it's too late. Also, the use of poison is not considered to be brave, noble, honorable or in any way self-sacrificing. It is "the cowards weapon" and that is, IMO, the reason why poison use is typically frowned upon. Now, from a completely pragmatic point of view, dead is dead and the rest is irrelevant. The means with which you destroy the invading Orc horde, weather through glorious battle or dark trickery, doesn't mean squat as long as you get the same results. However, and I've stated this before, in the D&D alignment system Good does not equal Pragmatic. Therefore, the use of poison which is highly pragmatic is not considered a Good act. Neutral, sure. Evil, definitely. As far as the Lawful part is concerned, it depends entirely on your character. If he has no personal code preventing him from using poisons then great. Just beause you are Lawful doesn't mean you obey the laws of your society, it just means that you strictly follow some kind of personal code. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
LN rogue using poison?
Top