Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Logic behind sales of "Expedition to Castle Greyhawk"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GVDammerung" data-source="post: 3590714" data-attributes="member: 33060"><p>Well, let's look at that for a moment. </p><p></p><p>Prior to the Folio, Greyhawk existed as a reference in some adventures. It did not exist as a fully functional setting. One had only bits and pieces to work with. Context beyond a purely local nature was almost totally lacking. Interrelationships between the pieces was similarly lacking. Greyhawk only became a functional setting with the Folio. Certainly, the earlier adventure references whetted the appetite but the payoff - the meal - was the full setting treatment of the Folio.</p><p></p><p>If we want to imagine a contemporary equivalent, Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk might beget another adventure or two, or three that used Greyhawk as background but the payoff would not be there until a new setting treatment was presented. So far, just what Wotc imagines as the payoff for good sales of Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk remains unclear. The "three's a crowd" setting limit strongly suggests that appetites whet by adventures, no matter how well they sell, cannot be paid off with a full setting treatment because there are only two slots for settings and they are filled. </p><p></p><p>Nothing indicates Greyhawk can get paid off with a new setting treatment. Of course, Wotc might have a new setting treatment in mind but nothing suggests it and, in fact, all empirical evidence is to the contrary as the two setting rule has not even been hinted at being revisited, let alone revised.</p><p></p><p>Knowing what is publically available to know, I don't see any conclusion other than that the sales of Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk are irrelevant to the Greyhawk setting and can at best see only the publication of some more adventures that use Greyhawk as a backdrop.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure you recognize that Greyhawk's use as the backdrop for an adventure, even allowing for some explaination of the particulars of the backdrop necessary to frame the adventure, is distinct from the presentation of Greyhawk as a functional setting. </p><p></p><p>The desire (at least by many) is for a setting that can support published or home brew adventures within a consistent context. That is not achieved with adventures alone, no matter how well grounded in the setting. I think it worth noting that this desire is born, not just out of personal desire by established fans of Greyhawk, but out of an equal desire of many of those fans to see _new_ fans become drawn to Greyhawk so that it may be profitable for Wotc to more regularly support the setting. In this, I think Wotc's interests and those of a goodly portion of Greyhawk fandom should align. Along this line, I think Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk will be well met but would be more enthusiastically looked forward to if there was some thought that its success could potentially be paid off in a new setting treatment. Talk of "tests" without more rings somewhat hollow otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GVDammerung, post: 3590714, member: 33060"] Well, let's look at that for a moment. Prior to the Folio, Greyhawk existed as a reference in some adventures. It did not exist as a fully functional setting. One had only bits and pieces to work with. Context beyond a purely local nature was almost totally lacking. Interrelationships between the pieces was similarly lacking. Greyhawk only became a functional setting with the Folio. Certainly, the earlier adventure references whetted the appetite but the payoff - the meal - was the full setting treatment of the Folio. If we want to imagine a contemporary equivalent, Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk might beget another adventure or two, or three that used Greyhawk as background but the payoff would not be there until a new setting treatment was presented. So far, just what Wotc imagines as the payoff for good sales of Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk remains unclear. The "three's a crowd" setting limit strongly suggests that appetites whet by adventures, no matter how well they sell, cannot be paid off with a full setting treatment because there are only two slots for settings and they are filled. Nothing indicates Greyhawk can get paid off with a new setting treatment. Of course, Wotc might have a new setting treatment in mind but nothing suggests it and, in fact, all empirical evidence is to the contrary as the two setting rule has not even been hinted at being revisited, let alone revised. Knowing what is publically available to know, I don't see any conclusion other than that the sales of Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk are irrelevant to the Greyhawk setting and can at best see only the publication of some more adventures that use Greyhawk as a backdrop. I'm sure you recognize that Greyhawk's use as the backdrop for an adventure, even allowing for some explaination of the particulars of the backdrop necessary to frame the adventure, is distinct from the presentation of Greyhawk as a functional setting. The desire (at least by many) is for a setting that can support published or home brew adventures within a consistent context. That is not achieved with adventures alone, no matter how well grounded in the setting. I think it worth noting that this desire is born, not just out of personal desire by established fans of Greyhawk, but out of an equal desire of many of those fans to see _new_ fans become drawn to Greyhawk so that it may be profitable for Wotc to more regularly support the setting. In this, I think Wotc's interests and those of a goodly portion of Greyhawk fandom should align. Along this line, I think Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk will be well met but would be more enthusiastically looked forward to if there was some thought that its success could potentially be paid off in a new setting treatment. Talk of "tests" without more rings somewhat hollow otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Logic behind sales of "Expedition to Castle Greyhawk"?
Top