Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Lolth!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5211206" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>To be honest, I'm most fond of a solo that has multiple attacks in a standard action and instead of being dazed/stunned it loses an attack. For example the Heroslayer Hydra loses 1 attack per daze/stun condition upon it, but otherwise isn't bothered by daze/stun. I like this a lot as it keeps daze/stun useful but it isn't about to be dominating the fight. Predictably enough said Hydra was a good challenge to an epic level party - when you can't lock it down and it has actions you end up with a great fight! Who would have guessed?</p><p></p><p>I'm also a fan of multiple initiative solos where a daze/stun removes an activation instead of normally affecting it. These solos are the best designed in 4E are coincidentally also produce the most fun battles. </p><p></p><p>This is where I think a solo rule that generally affects daze and stun conditions would be the best. It's action denial that truly screws solos and not general debuffs (though they don't help, in the end if you can't act at all you can't challenge anyone!). Making save ends effects better than "until end of next turn" is another entirely separate issue with its own problems. In reality save ends effects prove to be very good on normal monsters, but are worthless against solos due to their +5 saves. If you basically sabotage "until end of next turn effects" being better inherently on solos you make that balance much better anyway.</p><p></p><p>Because in the end the main advantage of "until end of next turn" is on solos. That's why you see PCs proliferate these, because the biggest and supposedly nastiest monsters are most trivially defeated with them. If solos are saving either way, then save ends becomes automatically better. If they're going to fail a save then save ends means it stays around longer, while they're going to have the same duration (or less) with an "until end of next turn" effect.</p><p></p><p>Against regular monsters the 50% chance of the effect continuing to last is good enough to keep save ends competitive. Change this dynamic with solos and you'll find PCs will be wanting to miss less with save ends effects on hits (and until next turn effects on a miss).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5211206, member: 78116"] To be honest, I'm most fond of a solo that has multiple attacks in a standard action and instead of being dazed/stunned it loses an attack. For example the Heroslayer Hydra loses 1 attack per daze/stun condition upon it, but otherwise isn't bothered by daze/stun. I like this a lot as it keeps daze/stun useful but it isn't about to be dominating the fight. Predictably enough said Hydra was a good challenge to an epic level party - when you can't lock it down and it has actions you end up with a great fight! Who would have guessed? I'm also a fan of multiple initiative solos where a daze/stun removes an activation instead of normally affecting it. These solos are the best designed in 4E are coincidentally also produce the most fun battles. This is where I think a solo rule that generally affects daze and stun conditions would be the best. It's action denial that truly screws solos and not general debuffs (though they don't help, in the end if you can't act at all you can't challenge anyone!). Making save ends effects better than "until end of next turn" is another entirely separate issue with its own problems. In reality save ends effects prove to be very good on normal monsters, but are worthless against solos due to their +5 saves. If you basically sabotage "until end of next turn effects" being better inherently on solos you make that balance much better anyway. Because in the end the main advantage of "until end of next turn" is on solos. That's why you see PCs proliferate these, because the biggest and supposedly nastiest monsters are most trivially defeated with them. If solos are saving either way, then save ends becomes automatically better. If they're going to fail a save then save ends means it stays around longer, while they're going to have the same duration (or less) with an "until end of next turn" effect. Against regular monsters the 50% chance of the effect continuing to last is good enough to keep save ends competitive. Change this dynamic with solos and you'll find PCs will be wanting to miss less with save ends effects on hits (and until next turn effects on a miss). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Lolth!
Top