Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Perram" data-source="post: 5077992" data-attributes="member: 84740">lonewolfdevel <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/271482-lone-wolf-sends-cease-desist-letters-anyone-using-term-army-builder-7.html#post5077947" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/enw/buttons/viewpost.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></a>,&nbsp; I find your tactics and community engagement distasteful and I wish you no success with them.&nbsp; Both with this issue and our previous issues together, you really need to work on your public relations techniques or at least get some one else to do them for you.&nbsp; And that opinion is completely appart to my feelings on this matter, and the previous, which as you know are negative.The name of your product is incredibly generic.&nbsp; I thought that lent it a bit of charm, honestly, at the time I heard about it.&nbsp; But the name of your product is simply a description of the exact thing it does, so your fight against people using this term to describe similar programs is both futile AND hurting your public image.This double talk your giving us now isn't helping either.&nbsp; You did threaten legal action, and you had a deadline in your missive, that's simple obvious to even a casual read of the letter.&nbsp; If that was unintentional, please see my above suggestion that you not act as the public face of your company if you can't make that a good face.In short, you've lost my business, after having just won it back.&nbsp; And I will not be the only one you loose over this.&nbsp; I don't think it will be crippling, but I believe this action was a poor choice on your part and that there will be consequences for choosing this path.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Perram, post: 5077992, member: 84740"] [B]lonewolfdevel[/B] [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/271482-lone-wolf-sends-cease-desist-letters-anyone-using-term-army-builder-7.html#post5077947"][IMG]http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/enw/buttons/viewpost.gif[/IMG][/URL], I find your tactics and community engagement distasteful and I wish you no success with them. Both with this issue and our previous issues together, you really need to work on your public relations techniques or at least get some one else to do them for you. And that opinion is completely appart to my feelings on this matter, and the previous, which as you know are negative. The name of your product is incredibly generic. I thought that lent it a bit of charm, honestly, at the time I heard about it. But the name of your product is simply a description of the exact thing it does, so your fight against people using this term to describe similar programs is both futile AND hurting your public image. This double talk your giving us now isn't helping either. You did threaten legal action, and you had a deadline in your missive, that's simple obvious to even a casual read of the letter. If that was unintentional, please see my above suggestion that you not act as the public face of your company if you can't make that a good face. In short, you've lost my business, after having just won it back. And I will not be the only one you loose over this. I don't think it will be crippling, but I believe this action was a poor choice on your part and that there will be consequences for choosing this path. [/QUOTE]

Verification