Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="lonewolfdevel" data-source="post: 5080663" data-attributes="member: 87800">Doh! I accidentally deleted this segment from my previous post on this issue, so I need to circle back on this. Sorry about that.I only have the information I was given by our IP attorney. He stated that the judge's ruling established the relationship. He did not provide me with any specific quotes, and I didn't ask, since I didn't think I'd need them. I honestly don't know the basis on which the relationship was apparently established. What he told me was that, based on the ruling, the handling of trademarks is essentially analogous to the DMCA. It's quite possible that the various elements of the ruling establish comparable mechanics for trademarks that largely parallel those of the DMCA. If so, no explicit reference would be necessary, yet an analogous behavior would be established.I will ask him about this specific issue and report back. Unfortunately, it's Friday night, so that likely won't be until Monday night. I'll send him an email, just in case he checks it over the weekend, but it's unlikely I'll hear back over the weekend. It definitely won't be tonight, since it's almost 3am in his timezone.</blockquote>