Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Garthanos" data-source="post: 5081784" data-attributes="member: 82504">And the US has free-speech as one of the highest laws of the land and trademarks should not ever be allowed to supercede it... But the us patent office is in the business of keeping lawyers in business so they let almost anything get through and let the lawyers duke it out, after all they aren't really qualified to make most of the decisions about what to deny or not. (I am only mildly exaggerating) so in effect it takes a bunch of money to undo abusive patents and undo abusive trademarks.... they rarely get preemptively stopped.&nbsp;I am pretty sure by law you could&nbsp; even&nbsp; describe a company&nbsp; as Dyas Designs - a lone wolf developer. Let alone a product as Arcane Enemies&nbsp; - a fantasy army builder.<a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/~wseltzer/INTA/sld016.htm" target="_blank">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/~wseltzer/INTA/sld016.htm</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Garthanos, post: 5081784, member: 82504"] And the US has free-speech as one of the highest laws of the land and trademarks should not ever be allowed to supercede it... But the us patent office is in the business of keeping lawyers in business so they let almost anything get through and let the lawyers duke it out, after all they aren't really qualified to make most of the decisions about what to deny or not. (I am only mildly exaggerating) so in effect it takes a bunch of money to undo abusive patents and undo abusive trademarks.... they rarely get preemptively stopped. I am pretty sure by law you could even describe a company as Dyas Designs - a lone wolf developer. Let alone a product as Arcane Enemies - a fantasy army builder. [url]http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/~wseltzer/INTA/sld016.htm[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification