Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Long Rests vs Short Rests
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 8266568" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>No it's still true because that number is significantly less than both the number of spells they can know or are reasonably likely to have in a spell book as well as less than the entire class list. The spells you are pinning your position on are generally too niche to bother preparing even <em>if</em> they are an option meaning the caster is going to be preparing spells that will at least have a good chance of providing <em>some</em> use during the current session rather than nothing but niche spells that can poorly solve a generally not very significant or pressing problem.</p><p></p><p>[USER=7019027]@Asisreo[/USER] already hit the very short partial list you gave. If that's the full list it suggests casters are very unfinished by covering such a small range of spell levels</p><p></p><p>Go ahead list off the <em>whole</em> batch of <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells" target="_blank"><em>specific</em> spells</a> you think support your position of the disparity of 5e's LWQF across all levels being justified, Give us a challenge & state why for each spell rather than just listing spells if you think your position is so strong rather than making us guess. </p><p></p><p>I'll give you credit for trying to hook in something new as part of this point rather than a point on its own though. On top of everything [USER=7019027]@Asisreo[/USER] noted above those 15 spells are also a big reduction from the past. You can look at it in detail <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iY1uvVwnZ-bKoGBXE7GxE3w-SZXxy0jaFkxjHDW1PNA/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">here</a> because the loss of flexibility is significantly more than slots alone would suggest as you had things like preparing a single cast of second level knock at mid to high levels had near zero opportunity cost being in one of the 4 2nd level slots while in 5e every niche spell prepared has the exact same opportunity cost as a bread & butter staple spell. There are a huge amount less actual spell slots at nearly every level in 5e than there were in the past too as one more attempt at countering LFQW to add onto the pile</p><p></p><p>as to <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/tiny-hut" target="_blank">tiny hut</a> itself, it's not yet been poited out that that the spell only exists on the bard & wizard lists</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 8266568, member: 93670"] No it's still true because that number is significantly less than both the number of spells they can know or are reasonably likely to have in a spell book as well as less than the entire class list. The spells you are pinning your position on are generally too niche to bother preparing even [I]if[/I] they are an option meaning the caster is going to be preparing spells that will at least have a good chance of providing [I]some[/I] use during the current session rather than nothing but niche spells that can poorly solve a generally not very significant or pressing problem. [USER=7019027]@Asisreo[/USER] already hit the very short partial list you gave. If that's the full list it suggests casters are very unfinished by covering such a small range of spell levels Go ahead list off the [I]whole[/I] batch of [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells'][I]specific[/I] spells[/URL] you think support your position of the disparity of 5e's LWQF across all levels being justified, Give us a challenge & state why for each spell rather than just listing spells if you think your position is so strong rather than making us guess. I'll give you credit for trying to hook in something new as part of this point rather than a point on its own though. On top of everything [USER=7019027]@Asisreo[/USER] noted above those 15 spells are also a big reduction from the past. You can look at it in detail [URL='https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iY1uvVwnZ-bKoGBXE7GxE3w-SZXxy0jaFkxjHDW1PNA/edit?usp=sharing']here[/URL] because the loss of flexibility is significantly more than slots alone would suggest as you had things like preparing a single cast of second level knock at mid to high levels had near zero opportunity cost being in one of the 4 2nd level slots while in 5e every niche spell prepared has the exact same opportunity cost as a bread & butter staple spell. There are a huge amount less actual spell slots at nearly every level in 5e than there were in the past too as one more attempt at countering LFQW to add onto the pile as to [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/tiny-hut']tiny hut[/URL] itself, it's not yet been poited out that that the spell only exists on the bard & wizard lists [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Long Rests vs Short Rests
Top