Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Long Rests vs Short Rests
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 8266642" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>No. It's "Come back her with those goalposts. And stop making up strawmen."</p><p></p><p>Come back here with those goalposts.</p><p></p><p>Me: The fighter <em>should </em>be the best at damage because they are naughty word at the other two pillars and have dropped all their resources into fighting.</p><p>You: Here are numbers to demonstrate that the fighter does more damage.</p><p></p><p>Which is what I am saying <em>should </em>happen. Come back here with those goalposts. </p><p></p><p>I don't <em>have to </em>have anything. Because you are creating what is known as a strawman argument.</p><p></p><p>I will repeat once more because it is clear you haven't got the point yet. <strong>The fighter and barbarian put basically 100% of their resources into doing damage and taking hits. If there is any sort of balance this means that the fighter and barbarian <em>should </em>be the best at fighting because they are naughty word at everything else.</strong></p><p></p><p>Me: The fighter has two skills plus their background and nothing else. The wizard has the same number of skills <em>plus their magic</em>. The fighter loses out of combat to even a wizard with just cantrips for non-combat work.</p><p>You: The fighter has the same number of skills as the wizard.</p><p></p><p>Well, duh! That's literally what I said. You somehow seem to think that having the same number of skills makes them comparable when it's skills plus magic vs skills plus nothing at all. And in order to rebut me you don't need me to go through all the spells and show which put the wizard beyond the fighter out of combat. You need to go through and demonstrate that precisely none of them do.</p><p></p><p>The fighter is basically a one trick pony. At first level they move 30' with a move action and swing a sharpened piece of metal hard and fast at targets within 5 foot. At twentieth level they move 30' and swing a sharpened piece of metal <em>very </em>hard and fast at targets within 5 foot. They are still a linear class, still doing basically the same thing at level 20 they were doing at level 1. They damn well <em>ought to</em> be good at it because they've given up everything else.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile a wizard has moved from being able to conjure a silent image of a red dragon to being able to turn into one permanently. The wizard's capabilities have massively expanded in ways that aren't measured on a simple scale.</p><p></p><p>Goodbye.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 8266642, member: 87792"] No. It's "Come back her with those goalposts. And stop making up strawmen." Come back here with those goalposts. Me: The fighter [I]should [/I]be the best at damage because they are naughty word at the other two pillars and have dropped all their resources into fighting. You: Here are numbers to demonstrate that the fighter does more damage. Which is what I am saying [I]should [/I]happen. Come back here with those goalposts. I don't [I]have to [/I]have anything. Because you are creating what is known as a strawman argument. I will repeat once more because it is clear you haven't got the point yet. [B]The fighter and barbarian put basically 100% of their resources into doing damage and taking hits. If there is any sort of balance this means that the fighter and barbarian [I]should [/I]be the best at fighting because they are naughty word at everything else.[/B] Me: The fighter has two skills plus their background and nothing else. The wizard has the same number of skills [I]plus their magic[/I]. The fighter loses out of combat to even a wizard with just cantrips for non-combat work. You: The fighter has the same number of skills as the wizard. Well, duh! That's literally what I said. You somehow seem to think that having the same number of skills makes them comparable when it's skills plus magic vs skills plus nothing at all. And in order to rebut me you don't need me to go through all the spells and show which put the wizard beyond the fighter out of combat. You need to go through and demonstrate that precisely none of them do. The fighter is basically a one trick pony. At first level they move 30' with a move action and swing a sharpened piece of metal hard and fast at targets within 5 foot. At twentieth level they move 30' and swing a sharpened piece of metal [I]very [/I]hard and fast at targets within 5 foot. They are still a linear class, still doing basically the same thing at level 20 they were doing at level 1. They damn well [I]ought to[/I] be good at it because they've given up everything else. Meanwhile a wizard has moved from being able to conjure a silent image of a red dragon to being able to turn into one permanently. The wizard's capabilities have massively expanded in ways that aren't measured on a simple scale. Goodbye. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Long Rests vs Short Rests
Top