Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8269230" data-attributes="member: 18">Because I'm not an idiot?Like, I know a clearly marked trap when I see one? If you're letting someone else dictate all the terms of a test - level, length of day, nature of encounters, and they're also getting to design their own character for the test, which they're obviously going to bias the terms towards (whether they mean to or not).And like what, only Fighters and Wizards exist now? How about Clerics, Druids, Bards, etc?Who is saying that? I'm not saying that. And this whole nonsense about &quot;overcompensating for 3.5's problems&quot; is just laughable. You've provided zero evidence that full casters are weak in 5E, and I've played 5E for years, and so the idea that full casters are weak is just silly joke. It's not even basically plausible. This is like the stuff that people were trying to claim when PF1 first came out and there were claims that the nerfs to a few spells had made full casters &quot;too weak&quot; and certainly solved LFQW.You still haven't even been able to substantiate your extremely funny QF claims. Your own math deeply undermined them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8269230, member: 18"] Because I'm not an idiot? Like, I know a clearly marked trap when I see one? If you're letting someone else dictate all the terms of a test - level, length of day, nature of encounters, and they're also getting to design their own character for the test, which they're obviously going to bias the terms towards (whether they mean to or not). And like what, only Fighters and Wizards exist now? How about Clerics, Druids, Bards, etc? Who is saying that? I'm not saying that. And this whole nonsense about "overcompensating for 3.5's problems" is just laughable. You've provided zero evidence that full casters are weak in 5E, and I've played 5E for years, and so the idea that full casters are weak is just silly joke. It's not even basically plausible. This is like the stuff that people were trying to claim when PF1 first came out and there were claims that the nerfs to a few spells had made full casters "too weak" and certainly solved LFQW. You still haven't even been able to substantiate your extremely funny QF claims. Your own math deeply undermined them. [/QUOTE]

Verification