Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Longer dying: more negative HP before death
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MarauderX" data-source="post: 3278490" data-attributes="member: 9990"><p>As the PCs get into higher levels, the encounters they face start dishing out more damage. Sometimes they will take 4 blows for 50 HP each, and few of them could survive it, suddenly dropping from full HP to well below -10 in moments. </p><p></p><p>Instead, I am looking at extending the number of negative HP before dying. Each PC below zero would still be dying, loosing -1 HP per round. Instead of -10 being the limit, the PC would have a negative range equal to their positive range of HP. For example, a barbarian with 213 HP without raging would have a -213 range before dying, and a wizard with 12 HP would die at -12. Take away stabilization unless someone with a healer kit comes to help. And even then the heal check DC might be higher depending on how negative the target is, or perhaps multiple heal checks might have to be made to stop the bleeding. </p><p></p><p>This helps a number of things with the game's mechanics. </p><p></p><p>Insta-death spells like Disintegrate would be used less often. Clerics would have a chance to be healed once they are knocked down to dying. Barbarians don't suffer the chance of death when their rage ends while they are still alive and active. Spells like Deathwatch and Death Knell become more useful. Clerics would have a better chance to get to a dying character, and don't have to worry about taking blame for getting into combat a little. Coup-de-grace's would be used more often to finish off peons and other foes instead of just wading through them to get to the BBEG cleric that has mass cures. </p><p></p><p>Would it mean less PC death? Yes, of course. But it would also work the other way too. Bad guys have the ability to bounce back into a fight with a little healing. Where you dropped a foe on the battlefield becomes important again. Killing would be a much more deliberate act, and grudges would develope from someone killing another with malice or purpose. </p><p></p><p>Has anyone seen a system with something like this or tried it yourself?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MarauderX, post: 3278490, member: 9990"] As the PCs get into higher levels, the encounters they face start dishing out more damage. Sometimes they will take 4 blows for 50 HP each, and few of them could survive it, suddenly dropping from full HP to well below -10 in moments. Instead, I am looking at extending the number of negative HP before dying. Each PC below zero would still be dying, loosing -1 HP per round. Instead of -10 being the limit, the PC would have a negative range equal to their positive range of HP. For example, a barbarian with 213 HP without raging would have a -213 range before dying, and a wizard with 12 HP would die at -12. Take away stabilization unless someone with a healer kit comes to help. And even then the heal check DC might be higher depending on how negative the target is, or perhaps multiple heal checks might have to be made to stop the bleeding. This helps a number of things with the game's mechanics. Insta-death spells like Disintegrate would be used less often. Clerics would have a chance to be healed once they are knocked down to dying. Barbarians don't suffer the chance of death when their rage ends while they are still alive and active. Spells like Deathwatch and Death Knell become more useful. Clerics would have a better chance to get to a dying character, and don't have to worry about taking blame for getting into combat a little. Coup-de-grace's would be used more often to finish off peons and other foes instead of just wading through them to get to the BBEG cleric that has mass cures. Would it mean less PC death? Yes, of course. But it would also work the other way too. Bad guys have the ability to bounce back into a fight with a little healing. Where you dropped a foe on the battlefield becomes important again. Killing would be a much more deliberate act, and grudges would develope from someone killing another with malice or purpose. Has anyone seen a system with something like this or tried it yourself? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Longer dying: more negative HP before death
Top