Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Doctor Proctor" data-source="post: 5737017" data-attributes="member: 78547">Yeah, this is a little like a guy saying &quot;Lifetime Playstation gamer, never owned an XBox.&nbsp; But this is what MS really needs to do with the XBoxLive service...&quot;&nbsp; If you play the game occassionally, then that's fine.&nbsp; But when you open up with how there's basically 0% chance of you ever buying any of the products, it makes your comment seem a bit uncouth.&nbsp;As Saracenus said, I'm not trying to deny your right to post here...&nbsp; Just saying that this is the same reason why you'll never see me posting in a 3e or Pathfinder thread about changes that need to be made, because I never played (and never will, most likely) those editions.&nbsp;&nbsp;I got you covered.&nbsp; It's always good to see people able to express things like that without getting petty about it.&nbsp;&nbsp;On Topic:One thing I would really like to see come out WotC (mostly likely through DDI, since it seems to make more sense that way) is some more extensive support for existing classes and builds.&nbsp; New builds are great and all, but we already have at least four for most of the classes (Exceptions of course).&nbsp;Examples: &nbsp;&nbsp; Classes like the Sorcerer could use some new powers usable by the existing builds that better fit the Soul properties.&nbsp;&nbsp; The Ardent has several builds, but the newer Impetuous build is still not available for multiclassing.&nbsp; There's also not a lot of feat support for the Impetuous build compared to the older two.&nbsp; See Heartening Surge, which only increases the bonuses for the original two builds, but not the Impetuous build.&nbsp;If they released more books like Heroes of the Feywild (more fluff, fewer new races/classes/builds) and used DDI and errata to add in some more support for the existing classes and builds, I would love that.&nbsp; You'd still get new shinies to play with, but there'd be less of a flood (There's what, 8 or 10 Fighter builds now?) and it would allow us to work better with what we have.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Doctor Proctor, post: 5737017, member: 78547"] Yeah, this is a little like a guy saying "Lifetime Playstation gamer, never owned an XBox. But this is what MS really needs to do with the XBoxLive service..." If you play the game occassionally, then that's fine. But when you open up with how there's basically 0% chance of you ever buying any of the products, it makes your comment seem a bit uncouth. As Saracenus said, I'm not trying to deny your right to post here... Just saying that this is the same reason why you'll never see me posting in a 3e or Pathfinder thread about changes that need to be made, because I never played (and never will, most likely) those editions. I got you covered. It's always good to see people able to express things like that without getting petty about it. [B]On Topic:[/B] One thing I would really like to see come out WotC (mostly likely through DDI, since it seems to make more sense that way) is some more extensive support for existing classes and builds. New builds are great and all, but we already have at least four for most of the classes (Exceptions of course). Examples: Classes like the Sorcerer could use some new powers usable by the existing builds that better fit the Soul properties. The Ardent has several builds, but the newer Impetuous build is still not available for multiclassing. There's also not a lot of feat support for the Impetuous build compared to the older two. See Heartening Surge, which only increases the bonuses for the original two builds, but not the Impetuous build. If they released more books like Heroes of the Feywild (more fluff, fewer new races/classes/builds) and used DDI and errata to add in some more support for the existing classes and builds, I would love that. You'd still get new shinies to play with, but there'd be less of a flood (There's what, 8 or 10 Fighter builds now?) and it would allow us to work better with what we have. [/QUOTE]

Verification