Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shadowlord" data-source="post: 928752" data-attributes="member: 10445">I'll do that. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I didn't ask for &quot;classic medieval RP&quot;, I wrote &quot;classic fantasy RP&quot;. Thus, real Earth mixed with myth like in Ars Magica isn't what I'm after, neither is Arthurian myth like in Pendragon. I want more of the fantasy element in it, without giving it a flashy, pulp feel like in D&amp;D (FR nowadays).I thank you for your support, but in fact I didn't see anything that convinced me. The settings are either too Earthly, or too flashy, too much (Talislanta's world for ex). My conclusion: I'll have to stick with D&amp;D, resist the manic urge to read or posses more &amp; more, and wait for DL for a fresh start. I don't like the idea of again buying three rulebooks though which for 3/4 content I already have.PS: Since DL is D&amp;D but always had an epic feel, putting the stress on story, and having a strong novel line, what do you think of the SAGA system? No dice, no books, all story &amp; RP. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I know some of you didn't like what changes the 5th age brought, but leaving that out, is it worth a try?And what do yoou think of Sovereign Stone? Is there a big storyline running through the setting, is there a goal? SS keeps all stereotypes like elves &amp; dwarves but adds a twist. Is this hard to grasp? Would they better have dropped those stereotypes altogether or kept them as they were instead of keeping 1/2 and changing 1/2 ?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shadowlord, post: 928752, member: 10445"] I'll do that. ;) I didn't ask for "classic medieval RP", I wrote "classic fantasy RP". Thus, real Earth mixed with myth like in Ars Magica isn't what I'm after, neither is Arthurian myth like in Pendragon. I want more of the fantasy element in it, without giving it a flashy, pulp feel like in D&D (FR nowadays). I thank you for your support, but in fact I didn't see anything that convinced me. The settings are either too Earthly, or too flashy, too much (Talislanta's world for ex). My conclusion: I'll have to stick with D&D, resist the manic urge to read or posses more & more, and wait for DL for a fresh start. I don't like the idea of again buying three rulebooks though which for 3/4 content I already have. PS: Since DL is D&D but always had an epic feel, putting the stress on story, and having a strong novel line, what do you think of the SAGA system? No dice, no books, all story & RP. :) I know some of you didn't like what changes the 5th age brought, but leaving that out, is it worth a try? And what do yoou think of Sovereign Stone? Is there a big storyline running through the setting, is there a goal? SS keeps all stereotypes like elves & dwarves but adds a twist. Is this hard to grasp? Would they better have dropped those stereotypes altogether or kept them as they were instead of keeping 1/2 and changing 1/2 ? [/QUOTE]

Verification