Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7043174" data-attributes="member: 15700">This is not true.&nbsp; The implemented some elements of the warlord into the BM, and took more of an official plunge with the PDK.&nbsp; It might not be exactly what you want for various reasons, but to say you can't even get if off the ground is simply not true.&nbsp; Especially since SCAG is more official than UA.Pure conjecture.&nbsp; Which seems to be the basis of a lot of your arguments in this thread.&nbsp; Accusing others who don't share your opinion as nothing more than people throwing tissy fits and edition warring, and now accusing them of preventing the class?&nbsp; If you're going to throw out accusations like this, where is your evidence?&nbsp; Because the only person who appears to be throwing a fit and using profanity is you.&nbsp; Not agreeing with you =/= trolling, or edition warring, or somehow oppressing your desires.They did go for it.&nbsp; The PDK.&nbsp; And what was the reaction?&nbsp; Not a very good one, that's for sure.&nbsp; It's WAY easier to design a subclass than a full on new class, so if they are going to go to that effort and spend the time and money doing it, it better be pretty good and a whole lot of players better want it.&nbsp; And seeing as how what they have put out has been met with a lot of vitriol, I'm not surprised they haven't done a full class.&nbsp; Look at how long it is taking for them to try to get the ranger right.&nbsp; And a lot more people like the ranger over the warlord as a core class.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 7043174, member: 15700"] This is not true. The implemented some elements of the warlord into the BM, and took more of an official plunge with the PDK. It might not be exactly what you want for various reasons, but to say you can't even get if off the ground is simply not true. Especially since SCAG is [I]more [/I]official than UA. Pure conjecture. Which seems to be the basis of a lot of your arguments in this thread. Accusing others who don't share your opinion as nothing more than people throwing tissy fits and edition warring, and now accusing them of preventing the class? If you're going to throw out accusations like this, where is your evidence? Because the only person who appears to be throwing a fit and using profanity is you. Not agreeing with you =/= trolling, or edition warring, or somehow oppressing your desires. They did go for it. The PDK. And what was the reaction? Not a very good one, that's for sure. It's WAY easier to design a subclass than a full on new class, so if they are going to go to that effort and spend the time and money doing it, it better be pretty good and a whole lot of players better want it. And seeing as how what they have put out has been met with a lot of vitriol, I'm not surprised they haven't done a full class. Look at how long it is taking for them to try to get the ranger right. And a lot more people like the ranger over the warlord as a core class. [/QUOTE]

Verification