Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Lord of the Rings: Did PJ lose the plot?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 1307301" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>a) I acknowledge that, in the light of hindsight, there may have been better courses of action than the ones taken in the text. My explication of the course of events was merely to show that, without the light of hindsight, the actions could have seemed reasonable to the characters at the time. Odd, isn't it, that Tolkien chose to create characters that aren't omniscient, so that they sometimes take sub-optimal paths? </p><p></p><p>b) No big deal? Funny, it seems from where I sit that you're calling me a liar or deciever. In order to call me less than forthright, you'd have to have some information indicating that I intentionally left information out, with specific intent to decieve. You don't have any such information, so stop with the (admittedly eriudite) name-calling. Attack the information and logic I present, and leave your ill-founded guesses on my motives out of it, please.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Everyone sees it, but only after the fact. Gandalf is not Merlin, who lives backwards so that he can see what will result. </p><p></p><p>As I recall the text, before Saruman turns on him, Gandalf has every reason to think that the plan will work swimmingly. And we have no reason to think otherwise, either. If not for Saruman, Gandalf would have made the rendevous, and they would have tripped it off to Rivendell with the Ringwraiths nowhere in sight. </p><p></p><p>Rarely is failure to see the treachery of an ally considered to paint a character "in a bad light", or lessen a character's stature. Epic heroes frequently miss treachery - they wouldn't think of doing it themselves, so they tend not to see it in others.</p><p></p><p>And as for Frodo - at the time, he's not yet an epic hero. He's pretty darned ignorant, and feels pretty small and unimportant, so his hesitation is easily understood.</p><p></p><p>And, let's pile on top of this the simple fact that tripping it off to Rivendell simply and easily would have been monumentally boring.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 1307301, member: 177"] a) I acknowledge that, in the light of hindsight, there may have been better courses of action than the ones taken in the text. My explication of the course of events was merely to show that, without the light of hindsight, the actions could have seemed reasonable to the characters at the time. Odd, isn't it, that Tolkien chose to create characters that aren't omniscient, so that they sometimes take sub-optimal paths? b) No big deal? Funny, it seems from where I sit that you're calling me a liar or deciever. In order to call me less than forthright, you'd have to have some information indicating that I intentionally left information out, with specific intent to decieve. You don't have any such information, so stop with the (admittedly eriudite) name-calling. Attack the information and logic I present, and leave your ill-founded guesses on my motives out of it, please. Everyone sees it, but only after the fact. Gandalf is not Merlin, who lives backwards so that he can see what will result. As I recall the text, before Saruman turns on him, Gandalf has every reason to think that the plan will work swimmingly. And we have no reason to think otherwise, either. If not for Saruman, Gandalf would have made the rendevous, and they would have tripped it off to Rivendell with the Ringwraiths nowhere in sight. Rarely is failure to see the treachery of an ally considered to paint a character "in a bad light", or lessen a character's stature. Epic heroes frequently miss treachery - they wouldn't think of doing it themselves, so they tend not to see it in others. And as for Frodo - at the time, he's not yet an epic hero. He's pretty darned ignorant, and feels pretty small and unimportant, so his hesitation is easily understood. And, let's pile on top of this the simple fact that tripping it off to Rivendell simply and easily would have been monumentally boring. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Lord of the Rings: Did PJ lose the plot?
Top