Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Lord of the Rings: Did PJ lose the plot?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 1308075" data-attributes="member: 812"><p>Somehow managing to stay clear of the endlessly entertaining efforts of everyone to pretend they're not insulting each other, I thought I'd re-address nikolai's points on the topic of the thread.</p><p></p><p>But please don't let me stop the "you're brainwashed!" debate. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>One by one...</p><p></p><p>Perhaps you missed pretty much all of Cate Blanchett's opening monologue in <em>Fellowship</em>, or most of Ian McKellen's lines from the first half of that movie. It is made abundantly clear that Sauron seeks dominion over Middle-Earth and if he gets the Ring his victory is assured.</p><p></p><p>I don't have to touch on this, do I? I can't believe anybody could watch these films and NOT get the impression that Gandalf wants the Ring destroyed.</p><p></p><p>Again, if you were watching the same movie I was watching, this is exactly what's happening.</p><p></p><p>Now indeed we do here encounter a change. The narrative is changed. But first, in the book, we don't in fact know what Sauron's reaction to seeing Pippin was. Gandalf theorises, but we are never told what the truth may be. Therefore, your attempt to build a case for necessary causality is lacking -- because you're pretending that it's crucial that Sauron thinks Saruman has betrayed him. It's not, nor is it crucial that Sauron thinks Aragorn has the ring.</p><p></p><p>That is, it's not crucial to the PLOT. The plot is NOT what characters think or feel. It is only the line of the action of the story. The plot of the Lord of the Rings is the effort to destroy the One Ring. In the book, what's important to the plot is that Pippin looks into the palantir, as does Aragorn, and after that, Sauron launches his attack on Minas Tirith.</p><p></p><p>So what do we have in the movie? We have Pippin looking into the palantir, and subsequent to this (because of it, Gandalf theorises) Sauron launches his attack on Minas Tirith. The missing component to the narrative is Aragorn looking into the palantir. However the plot is maintained, and even causality is provided as Gandalf suggests that Sauron thinks Pippin is in fact the Ringbearer, and will therefore begin his attack speedily.</p><p></p><p>Denethor's madness has nothing to do with the plot of Lord of the Rings. It is an interesting part of the story, and has a great deal to do with Pippin's character arc (to say nothing of Faramir's), but it has nothing to do with the plot.</p><p></p><p>From a plot standpoint, Denethor can be dispensed with because he is no longer needed: the King is about to arrive and with Denethor gone there is no barrier to Aragorn assuming command. The mechanics of how he goes are immaterial to the plot.</p><p></p><p>You are in some cases indeed pointing out changes between the movie and the book. And you have every right to dislike those changes, or even to feel that you couldn't enjoy the story because of them. I have no argument with that.</p><p></p><p>I'm just pointing out that the plot from novel to movie is not DRAMATICALLY changed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 1308075, member: 812"] Somehow managing to stay clear of the endlessly entertaining efforts of everyone to pretend they're not insulting each other, I thought I'd re-address nikolai's points on the topic of the thread. But please don't let me stop the "you're brainwashed!" debate. :D One by one... Perhaps you missed pretty much all of Cate Blanchett's opening monologue in [i]Fellowship[/i], or most of Ian McKellen's lines from the first half of that movie. It is made abundantly clear that Sauron seeks dominion over Middle-Earth and if he gets the Ring his victory is assured. I don't have to touch on this, do I? I can't believe anybody could watch these films and NOT get the impression that Gandalf wants the Ring destroyed. Again, if you were watching the same movie I was watching, this is exactly what's happening. Now indeed we do here encounter a change. The narrative is changed. But first, in the book, we don't in fact know what Sauron's reaction to seeing Pippin was. Gandalf theorises, but we are never told what the truth may be. Therefore, your attempt to build a case for necessary causality is lacking -- because you're pretending that it's crucial that Sauron thinks Saruman has betrayed him. It's not, nor is it crucial that Sauron thinks Aragorn has the ring. That is, it's not crucial to the PLOT. The plot is NOT what characters think or feel. It is only the line of the action of the story. The plot of the Lord of the Rings is the effort to destroy the One Ring. In the book, what's important to the plot is that Pippin looks into the palantir, as does Aragorn, and after that, Sauron launches his attack on Minas Tirith. So what do we have in the movie? We have Pippin looking into the palantir, and subsequent to this (because of it, Gandalf theorises) Sauron launches his attack on Minas Tirith. The missing component to the narrative is Aragorn looking into the palantir. However the plot is maintained, and even causality is provided as Gandalf suggests that Sauron thinks Pippin is in fact the Ringbearer, and will therefore begin his attack speedily. Denethor's madness has nothing to do with the plot of Lord of the Rings. It is an interesting part of the story, and has a great deal to do with Pippin's character arc (to say nothing of Faramir's), but it has nothing to do with the plot. From a plot standpoint, Denethor can be dispensed with because he is no longer needed: the King is about to arrive and with Denethor gone there is no barrier to Aragorn assuming command. The mechanics of how he goes are immaterial to the plot. You are in some cases indeed pointing out changes between the movie and the book. And you have every right to dislike those changes, or even to feel that you couldn't enjoy the story because of them. I have no argument with that. I'm just pointing out that the plot from novel to movie is not DRAMATICALLY changed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Lord of the Rings: Did PJ lose the plot?
Top