Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Lorraine Williams: Is it Time for a Reevaluation?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 8439740" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>To me, the issue, in a nutshell, is how we talk about these things. </p><p></p><p>So, I am sorry, but you're providing me with a case study. I'm going to pick it apart, to show a bit about unconscious biases. You are not a bad person - just human. Humans do this stuff all the time.</p><p></p><p>My foremost point is that this doesn't match what you wrote above, that she would sell off rights piecemeal out of spite. Indeed, if we take Dancy at face value, and the rights were already put up as collateral, she couldn't do that. And the correct information was here on this site.</p><p></p><p>My secondary point is that... well, "cutting it up and selling it piecemeal" is evocatively phrased enough to seem emotionally loaded.</p><p></p><p>Which adds up to - we're using emotionally loaded phrases against her, when we don't know really have our facts straight... we could, but we don't...</p><p></p><p>...and <em>SHE</em> is the one who might be spiteful?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Have you considered that, "they were afraid she might," is less a statement about her, than it is a statement about <em>their fears</em>? What if their fears were irrational, or poorly founded? Have you thought about that? I mean, with all these various stories, does TSR of the day sound like it was a place with a lot of clean, clear, and honest communication going on? Or does it sound like a place of fear, confusion, blame-throwing and responsibility-dodging? We should question if any of these people had a healthy working relationship with her - if they didn't, their claims about <em>why</em> she was doing it are suspect, as they probably wouldn't know her well enough to say.</p><p></p><p>Why don't we stop and consider the nuanced possibility that the situation and feelings at WotC were complicated, and not all due to a single problematic person (Williams). Why don't we consider the possibility that there were many failures there, by many people, both in the executive and creative sides, and that the entire blame for how it all turned out likely doesn't lay on one person? </p><p></p><p>That we lean toward accepting one narrative, and don't accept much questioning of that narrative, is a demonstration of biases existing in our thoughts on the matter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 8439740, member: 177"] To me, the issue, in a nutshell, is how we talk about these things. So, I am sorry, but you're providing me with a case study. I'm going to pick it apart, to show a bit about unconscious biases. You are not a bad person - just human. Humans do this stuff all the time. My foremost point is that this doesn't match what you wrote above, that she would sell off rights piecemeal out of spite. Indeed, if we take Dancy at face value, and the rights were already put up as collateral, she couldn't do that. And the correct information was here on this site. My secondary point is that... well, "cutting it up and selling it piecemeal" is evocatively phrased enough to seem emotionally loaded. Which adds up to - we're using emotionally loaded phrases against her, when we don't know really have our facts straight... we could, but we don't... ...and [I]SHE[/I] is the one who might be spiteful? Have you considered that, "they were afraid she might," is less a statement about her, than it is a statement about [I]their fears[/I]? What if their fears were irrational, or poorly founded? Have you thought about that? I mean, with all these various stories, does TSR of the day sound like it was a place with a lot of clean, clear, and honest communication going on? Or does it sound like a place of fear, confusion, blame-throwing and responsibility-dodging? We should question if any of these people had a healthy working relationship with her - if they didn't, their claims about [I]why[/I] she was doing it are suspect, as they probably wouldn't know her well enough to say. Why don't we stop and consider the nuanced possibility that the situation and feelings at WotC were complicated, and not all due to a single problematic person (Williams). Why don't we consider the possibility that there were many failures there, by many people, both in the executive and creative sides, and that the entire blame for how it all turned out likely doesn't lay on one person? That we lean toward accepting one narrative, and don't accept much questioning of that narrative, is a demonstration of biases existing in our thoughts on the matter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Lorraine Williams: Is it Time for a Reevaluation?
Top