Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Incenjucar" data-source="post: 5452743" data-attributes="member: 6182">I disagree. Ki is psionic, psionic is ki. Arguably the monk should have something to spend Power Points on, and that wouldn't have been hard to build into the class, and Full Discipline could be spread to other classes (possibly NOT tied to power source). It is certainly arguable that runepriests and seekers were done incorrectly, though I have no issue with their inclusion. I cannot begin to form an opinion on Shadow, because we have not seen what they're doing with it. I'm uncomfortable with the direction it may be going, but WotC's information is too vague these days for anyone to derive enough facts to judge anything prior to release.Regarding the elemental power source, I will defend its validity as a concept for the foreseeable future, considering I've dabbled in non-arcane elementalist class concepts since 2nd Edition. Feel free to necro an Elemental Power Source thread where you are likely to see just some of the ideas I have on how it can be implemented.With... let's call them kionics... I feel they should do more with it. The power source has been squandered by being hurled out to appease the absolute requirement that D&D have monks and psionicists, and then fled from as soon as possible lest the chorus of wails of "sci-fi!" from the darkest pits of scorn flay the flesh from their bones.</blockquote>