Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Lost "Par Avion" 3/14/07
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightPhoenix" data-source="post: 3399782" data-attributes="member: 115"><p>Here's the main reason I liked this episode a lot more than the last - it was characterized so much better. If they had written Kate/Sayid/Locke like they did this week, last week, it would have been a much better episode. Kate gets to be crafty and resourceful, Locke isn't just a total nutbar, and Sayid... well, okay. Sayid, but not the flashbacks, was the only decent thing about last weeks episode.</p><p></p><p>That said, the entire first scene with the "away team" needed to be in last week's episode. It works in this episode, but it would have bookmarked the last episode better. Start the episode with them all together, albeit warily, and end with them all fighting. That's the power of the Others, to divide and conquer. Contrast that with the survivors' mantra - live together, die alone. I do wish this would be played up a bit. Also, finding the fence would have been a great teaser, I think.</p><p></p><p>Last week, Locke was just a loon. This week, Locke actually has <em>reasons</em>, and that goes a long way towards ameliorating his nutbar status. I found myself agreeing with both Locke and Sayid, and having trouble choosing one side over the other (no pun intended <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ). Again, that's something that was lacking in the last episode, moral ambiguity. Of course, Locke just goes and does his own thing anyway - which is totally in character. Only this time it had a point.</p><p></p><p>Recap - Kate is there because she's guilty over choosing Sawyer. Locke is there for an unknown reason, but I'm guessing it has to do with getting to talk to Ben. Danielle is there for Alex. That leaves Sayid as the only one there to really rescue Jack? Or is he just playing babysitter?</p><p></p><p>So, there's more evidence that the reason Charlie keeps dying is because of Claire. I'd really love it if the simplest way for Desmond to save Charlie is to keep him away from her. I do like Desmond and Charlie interacting, they have a great chemistry. One of the biggest problems I've had with Charlie is that they kept trying to force the Locke and Eko interactions and they always rang false. I buy Charlie/Desmond and Charlie/Sawyer, and even Charlie/Sayid a lot more. I think it has to do with the snark.</p><p></p><p>I do want to say that I'm beginning to feel the flashback format is starting to get tired, especially with certain characters. Claire is not one of them, because we don't have a whole lot of background on her - she's had two before this one, and one of those was on-island. So it was welcome. However, some characters' flashbacks just feel forced now, because we've got all the important parts to understand them. Among those is Locke... which is why I'm not looking forward to next week's eppy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightPhoenix, post: 3399782, member: 115"] Here's the main reason I liked this episode a lot more than the last - it was characterized so much better. If they had written Kate/Sayid/Locke like they did this week, last week, it would have been a much better episode. Kate gets to be crafty and resourceful, Locke isn't just a total nutbar, and Sayid... well, okay. Sayid, but not the flashbacks, was the only decent thing about last weeks episode. That said, the entire first scene with the "away team" needed to be in last week's episode. It works in this episode, but it would have bookmarked the last episode better. Start the episode with them all together, albeit warily, and end with them all fighting. That's the power of the Others, to divide and conquer. Contrast that with the survivors' mantra - live together, die alone. I do wish this would be played up a bit. Also, finding the fence would have been a great teaser, I think. Last week, Locke was just a loon. This week, Locke actually has [i]reasons[/i], and that goes a long way towards ameliorating his nutbar status. I found myself agreeing with both Locke and Sayid, and having trouble choosing one side over the other (no pun intended :) ). Again, that's something that was lacking in the last episode, moral ambiguity. Of course, Locke just goes and does his own thing anyway - which is totally in character. Only this time it had a point. Recap - Kate is there because she's guilty over choosing Sawyer. Locke is there for an unknown reason, but I'm guessing it has to do with getting to talk to Ben. Danielle is there for Alex. That leaves Sayid as the only one there to really rescue Jack? Or is he just playing babysitter? So, there's more evidence that the reason Charlie keeps dying is because of Claire. I'd really love it if the simplest way for Desmond to save Charlie is to keep him away from her. I do like Desmond and Charlie interacting, they have a great chemistry. One of the biggest problems I've had with Charlie is that they kept trying to force the Locke and Eko interactions and they always rang false. I buy Charlie/Desmond and Charlie/Sawyer, and even Charlie/Sayid a lot more. I think it has to do with the snark. I do want to say that I'm beginning to feel the flashback format is starting to get tired, especially with certain characters. Claire is not one of them, because we don't have a whole lot of background on her - she's had two before this one, and one of those was on-island. So it was welcome. However, some characters' flashbacks just feel forced now, because we've got all the important parts to understand them. Among those is Locke... which is why I'm not looking forward to next week's eppy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Lost "Par Avion" 3/14/07
Top