Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Taelorn76" data-source="post: 2728907" data-attributes="member: 14747">Maybe it's just me, but something about the locations of where certain parts of the plane crashed don't add up to me. We had the mid section of the plane crash into the island in a water to land direction, with the cockpit landing further in land. Which makes sense to me. My problem is that the tail section fell off first, yet it landed on the opposite side of the island, what appears to be ahead of the fuselage and cockpit.-----&gt; Fuselage ----&gt;Cockpit------------------------------&lt;----TailOcean-----&gt;Beach-----&gt;Island/Jungle------&gt;Beach----&gt;Ocean.Hope that kind of makes sense. The only other explanation I can think of is that the tail section landed on the same side of the Island as the fuselage, but just way further up or down the beach. If Sayid had kept walking along the beach instaed of following that cable he might have come across their crash site.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Taelorn76, post: 2728907, member: 14747"] Maybe it's just me, but something about the locations of where certain parts of the plane crashed don't add up to me. We had the mid section of the plane crash into the island in a water to land direction, with the cockpit landing further in land. Which makes sense to me. My problem is that the tail section fell off first, yet it landed on the opposite side of the island, what appears to be ahead of the fuselage and cockpit. -----> Fuselage ---->Cockpit------------------------------<----Tail Ocean----->Beach----->Island/Jungle------>Beach---->Ocean. Hope that kind of makes sense. The only other explanation I can think of is that the tail section landed on the same side of the Island as the fuselage, but just way further up or down the beach. If Sayid had kept walking along the beach instaed of following that cable he might have come across their crash site. [/QUOTE]

Verification