Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Telperion" data-source="post: 1514865" data-attributes="member: 15711">I'll also have my say: 3.5 is very good <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.Like Merric most of the changes that seem to irritate people don't really affect my campaign in any great way. We don't have any clerics or druids as PC's. No Paladins because it is an Evil campaign. Some of the spells have been nerfed, but that's okay. I still use Relics and Rituals, so nothing has changed there (although I here there's a revision to 3.5 coming next autumn in the form of Relics and Rituals 3).All in all everything feels better than in 3.0. I totally agree that both the Bard and Ranger classes look much better now. Up until now no one really wanted to play bard, ranger or paladin in my group. Paladin is still not an option, but since the revision I have seen more interest towards the other two classes. I liked their flavor in 3.0, but they just didn't work. Looking back at the 3.0 ranger I just have to wonder what WotC was thinking?I'm filling my bookshelf with 3.5 books, so hopefully the wells at WotC and S&SS won't run dry anytime soon. I still haven't got XPH, but it has finally arrived to Finland. Hoping to pick it up next week  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool    :cool:"  data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> .</blockquote>

Verification