Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Low Damage, High HP ... How is this "Faster"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceFractal" data-source="post: 4067392" data-attributes="member: 27704"><p>One thing that immediately struck me about the 4E Rogue is how much lower damage it was dealing than in 3E. And since the Rogue is a Striker, other non-Striker classes will presumably be doing <em>less</em> damage than the Rogue. </p><p></p><p>This isn't inherently bad - HP are all relative anyway. However, this lower damage doesn't seem to be paired with lower HP - quite the opposite in fact. Even though Con adds less to HP, the higher starting amount and higher per-level base, not to mention the higher number of levels, result in a usually higher total. </p><p></p><p>Which applies to monsters as well - the 4E Pit Fiend has significantly more HP than the 3E one, and is an "Elite" monster, apparently meant to be faced in pairs, with additionally the capability to summon backup. Overall, the opposition is fielding considerably more HP than before.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So - lower damage + higher HP = larger # of attacks to kill something. Now it doesn't matter how streamlined they made the rounds - you can't make rolling a single attack much faster. And while one attack/round is faster on a per-round basis, it's <em>slower</em> on a per-attack basis - imagine 3E if you could move and do a swift action between each attack of a full-attack action.</p><p></p><p>This leads me to believe that battles will, if anything, take rather longer. Sure, each round may be faster, more time may pass "in-game", but you're still looking at long, drawn out battles in real-time.</p><p></p><p>Is that really an improvement? Not so much, IMO - it may lend itself more to drawn-out swashbuckling, but it makes ambushes and assassinations somewhat nonsensical. And at the end of the day, it still takes -ing hours to run a fight. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Bonus Feature: </p><p>My new guess for "Who will be the ___Zilla of 4E?" is "any class that can win/resolve a fight without having to ablate through HP."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceFractal, post: 4067392, member: 27704"] One thing that immediately struck me about the 4E Rogue is how much lower damage it was dealing than in 3E. And since the Rogue is a Striker, other non-Striker classes will presumably be doing [I]less[/I] damage than the Rogue. This isn't inherently bad - HP are all relative anyway. However, this lower damage doesn't seem to be paired with lower HP - quite the opposite in fact. Even though Con adds less to HP, the higher starting amount and higher per-level base, not to mention the higher number of levels, result in a usually higher total. Which applies to monsters as well - the 4E Pit Fiend has significantly more HP than the 3E one, and is an "Elite" monster, apparently meant to be faced in pairs, with additionally the capability to summon backup. Overall, the opposition is fielding considerably more HP than before. So - lower damage + higher HP = larger # of attacks to kill something. Now it doesn't matter how streamlined they made the rounds - you can't make rolling a single attack much faster. And while one attack/round is faster on a per-round basis, it's [I]slower[/I] on a per-attack basis - imagine 3E if you could move and do a swift action between each attack of a full-attack action. This leads me to believe that battles will, if anything, take rather longer. Sure, each round may be faster, more time may pass "in-game", but you're still looking at long, drawn out battles in real-time. Is that really an improvement? Not so much, IMO - it may lend itself more to drawn-out swashbuckling, but it makes ambushes and assassinations somewhat nonsensical. And at the end of the day, it still takes -ing hours to run a fight. Bonus Feature: My new guess for "Who will be the ___Zilla of 4E?" is "any class that can win/resolve a fight without having to ablate through HP." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Low Damage, High HP ... How is this "Faster"?
Top