Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aus_Snow" data-source="post: 4811664" data-attributes="member: 29112">Yep. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />11th level Druids in that kind of campaign? Not good, IMO. You could just flat out remove all the full casters, and maybe Bards as well for good measure. . . or you could do as suggested above - that is, requiring a level of non-spellcaster for every level of spellcaster. It's simple, but many have found it to work pretty well, not least because spellcasters suffer awfully from multiclassing. Yay! They will still have powers as others could only dream, but will have to pay for the damn things, for a change. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/rant.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rant:" title="Rant&nbsp; &nbsp; :rant:" data-shortname=":rant:" /> FWIW, I prefer the former solution, brutal as it might appear. And be, in fact. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devil.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":devil:" title="Devil&nbsp; &nbsp; :devil:" data-shortname=":devil:" />Ahem. That's my perspective, for low magic campaigns anyhow. But then, I'm of the opinion that no edition of D&amp;D is particularly well-suited to that style of game. They're simply not built that way, to put it bluntly. There is, luckily, a veritable plethora of alternatives out there, including several d20 variants if that's your poison. :shrug: But either way, good luck with it. In the end, whatever works for you all, and y'all feel comfortable with, naturally.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aus_Snow, post: 4811664, member: 29112"] Yep. :) 11th level Druids in that kind of campaign? Not good, IMO. You could just flat out remove all the full casters, and maybe Bards as well for good measure. . . or you could do as suggested above - that is, requiring a level of non-spellcaster for every level of spellcaster. It's simple, but many have found it to work pretty well, not least because spellcasters suffer awfully from multiclassing. Yay! They will still have powers as others could only dream, but will have to [I]pay[/I] for the damn things, for a change. :rant: FWIW, I prefer the former solution, brutal as it might appear. And [I]be[/I], in fact. :devil: Ahem. That's my perspective, for low magic campaigns anyhow. But then, I'm of the opinion that no edition of D&D is particularly well-suited to that style of game. They're simply not built that way, to put it bluntly. There is, luckily, a veritable plethora of alternatives out there, including several d20 variants if that's your poison. :shrug: But either way, good luck with it. In the end, whatever works for you all, and y'all feel comfortable with, naturally. [/QUOTE]

Verification