Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Low INT and skill points.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 2623010" data-attributes="member: 111"><p>Actually, you are partially right. It is possible to read the rules to allow only 1 skill point per level for humans with low intelligence, but it's not really possible to do that definatively.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, the text "1. Determine the number of skill points ... at least 1 skill point ... even if he or she has an Intelligence penalty." and then, in a following sentence, "A human gets 1 extra skill point per level..." is, in fact, contained within an ordered list. It makes it look like you first figure out the skill points and THEN figure in the extra human one. </p><p></p><p>You may read it either way, true, but it's a bit of a stretch to ignore the order of the steps contained within the quoted step 1. These sentences are contained within an ordered list, so ignoring the fact that they happen one after another seems to ignore the fact that they are within an ordered list.</p><p></p><p>The analysis applies to first level as well, but it's just plain a lot more typing for the first level text anaylsis. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Remember that this is the rules forum - it's about interpreting what the rules say - it's up to each DM to do whatever seems right with what we say. A lot of what we do here is intellectual exercises on fine points of the rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 2623010, member: 111"] Actually, you are partially right. It is possible to read the rules to allow only 1 skill point per level for humans with low intelligence, but it's not really possible to do that definatively. On the other hand, the text "1. Determine the number of skill points ... at least 1 skill point ... even if he or she has an Intelligence penalty." and then, in a following sentence, "A human gets 1 extra skill point per level..." is, in fact, contained within an ordered list. It makes it look like you first figure out the skill points and THEN figure in the extra human one. You may read it either way, true, but it's a bit of a stretch to ignore the order of the steps contained within the quoted step 1. These sentences are contained within an ordered list, so ignoring the fact that they happen one after another seems to ignore the fact that they are within an ordered list. The analysis applies to first level as well, but it's just plain a lot more typing for the first level text anaylsis. :) Remember that this is the rules forum - it's about interpreting what the rules say - it's up to each DM to do whatever seems right with what we say. A lot of what we do here is intellectual exercises on fine points of the rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Low INT and skill points.
Top