Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TwoSix" data-source="post: 7381021" data-attributes="member: 205"><p>I respect your opinion, but I feel you're incorrect as to the intention.  I believe the intention was to allow the druid to spend most of their time in animal form if so desired, albeit at the cost of lack of access to your most potent abilities (spells), as well as the ability to communicate.  Note that this was the most common playstyle for druids in the previous two editions, except in those editions, wildshaped druids had even greater potency (Natural Spell in 3.5, at-will shifting in 4e).  I see no reason not to assume that the designers made the duration in 5e what it is, and indicated that the shape lasts through rests, except to support the "mostly animal form druid" playstyle that existed previously.</p></blockquote><p></p>