Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"low" magic campaign using D&D rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3516456" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>That's where I tend to take issue with the statement. The problem I have is that while to a certain extent you are correct about some of the problems that have to be considered, every single time someone starts a thread on low magic a certain crowd of people show up arguing that this is 'badwrongfun'. And while that might not be your intention, you are making the same arguments that other people with this intention use as cover for derailing the thread.</p><p></p><p>There have been alot of people making statements along these lines, but they tended to make them as positive statements - "These are the sort of things you can do to avoid potential pitfalls." Statements like, "If you reduce PC equipment you may have to adjust some encounters.", are at this point not very helpful. Not only are they straight forward obvious, but historically people who make this criticism aren't normally doing so out of a love and appreciation for low magic campaigning and a desire to be helpful. If you are, I think you should try to give more positive contributions rather than appearing to harangue everyone that is.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I think that this is an example of why I don't trust that you are trying to make a positive contribution to this thread.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And this false factoid is trotted out every time some one wants to claim that low magic games are 'badwrongfun'. I've done the math before and posted it here on just about every monster in the 1st edition monster manual, and this assertion is simply false.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3516456, member: 4937"] That's where I tend to take issue with the statement. The problem I have is that while to a certain extent you are correct about some of the problems that have to be considered, every single time someone starts a thread on low magic a certain crowd of people show up arguing that this is 'badwrongfun'. And while that might not be your intention, you are making the same arguments that other people with this intention use as cover for derailing the thread. There have been alot of people making statements along these lines, but they tended to make them as positive statements - "These are the sort of things you can do to avoid potential pitfalls." Statements like, "If you reduce PC equipment you may have to adjust some encounters.", are at this point not very helpful. Not only are they straight forward obvious, but historically people who make this criticism aren't normally doing so out of a love and appreciation for low magic campaigning and a desire to be helpful. If you are, I think you should try to give more positive contributions rather than appearing to harangue everyone that is. And I think that this is an example of why I don't trust that you are trying to make a positive contribution to this thread. And this false factoid is trotted out every time some one wants to claim that low magic games are 'badwrongfun'. I've done the math before and posted it here on just about every monster in the 1st edition monster manual, and this assertion is simply false. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"low" magic campaign using D&D rules
Top