Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
[LPF] From Whence None Return
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jkason" data-source="post: 6321340" data-attributes="member: 2710"><p>[sblock=ooc]The spell says cubic feet, so it seems pretty explicit. A lot of other spells say "5 foot square" or similar for area, so I imagine that's what it would say if that's how they meant it to be calculated. My geometry skills just suck, and I was too lazy to look up the actual method for calculating cubic feet. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> It's honestly the first time I've ever tried to use the spell, so there's no worries from me. Now I have a better handle on how it works. </p><p></p><p>As to that making it underpowered: well, unlike Create Pit, Stone Shape lets you do a whole bunch of things depending on your imagination: create thin walls, stairs, ladders, statues, jail bars, whatever (so long as they meet the cubic foot restriction). I think it's meant to be more of a utility spell than a real battlefield control spell. If my lazy-math version actually worked, it would probably be really overpowered for creative users, who would be crushing large areas of creatures in dungeon rooms by shaping 2 and 3 squares of floor up into the low roof with something that doesn't allow a saving throw (which I probably totally would have tried if I'd been close enough and it worked that way. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ). </p><p></p><p>It looks like this combat is nearly resolved, anyway, and it's not like it's out of character for Weel to expect people to defy normal physics by squeezing through narrow cracks, seeing as he's a bit cracked, himself. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> [/sblock]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jkason, post: 6321340, member: 2710"] [sblock=ooc]The spell says cubic feet, so it seems pretty explicit. A lot of other spells say "5 foot square" or similar for area, so I imagine that's what it would say if that's how they meant it to be calculated. My geometry skills just suck, and I was too lazy to look up the actual method for calculating cubic feet. :) It's honestly the first time I've ever tried to use the spell, so there's no worries from me. Now I have a better handle on how it works. As to that making it underpowered: well, unlike Create Pit, Stone Shape lets you do a whole bunch of things depending on your imagination: create thin walls, stairs, ladders, statues, jail bars, whatever (so long as they meet the cubic foot restriction). I think it's meant to be more of a utility spell than a real battlefield control spell. If my lazy-math version actually worked, it would probably be really overpowered for creative users, who would be crushing large areas of creatures in dungeon rooms by shaping 2 and 3 squares of floor up into the low roof with something that doesn't allow a saving throw (which I probably totally would have tried if I'd been close enough and it worked that way. :) ). It looks like this combat is nearly resolved, anyway, and it's not like it's out of character for Weel to expect people to defy normal physics by squeezing through narrow cracks, seeing as he's a bit cracked, himself. :) [/sblock] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
[LPF] From Whence None Return
Top