Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 1527460" data-attributes="member: 10177">Sej is quoting an FAQ, it is far from the rules. I will follow the rules logic in the PH that clearly states that the monks body weapons are effected by spells that enhance natural weapons. Either her fist/hand/claws are natural, or they are not. Spells do not let you have it both ways. That FAQ says a monks hand/feet are not natural weapons when the PH clearly states they have to be, or the mentioned spells will not work. the logic needs to stay as consistant as possible. Hands/fist/feet/claws/bites/etc... are all natural weapons.I still would not allow a bite to be used in a flurry, but I would consider letting such a Monk to take a feat to allow them to use a bite in their flurry attack. Claws, on the other hand, are just an extension of the hands or feet. Those I will allow.As for the flurry of blows, you have seen plenty of martial arts movies, I hope and assume, to where you have seen super fast punches and kicks. Those are the game equivelant of a flurry. Granted any body part of a Monk can be used. By that same logic neither should a body part be excluded, even claws.you guys can go with the FAQ. You are DM's and are perfectly capable of deciding on how you want to interpret the rules or FAQ's. I will go with what I consider to be the better logic, especially when an FAQ counters the PH statement that the monks hands/feet/etc are enchantable by spells that enhance natural weapons. Those same natural weapons that the monk otherwise uses to deliver the majority of their attacks.</blockquote>

Verification