Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
lycanthrope monk - flurry with natural attacks?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sejs" data-source="post: 1527608" data-attributes="member: 4910"><p>Camarath:</p><p> Actually, you can, but as a secondary attack. So say for example I have an elven monk with a longsword. I can use the full attack action to get my normal alotment of monk attacks, including flurry, and then take a single attack with the longsword at the normal two-weapon fighting penalties (including the penalty for the secondary weapon not being light in this example... ouch). Or you can use the longsword as your primary weapon, getting a single secondary attack with your unarmed strike. What you <em>cannot</em> do is use the longsword as your primary weapon, and flurry with your unarmed strike as a secondary attack. Basically if you want to get multiple attacks with a secondary weapon, you need to take the improved/greater two-weapon fighting feats.</p><p> Right. Unarmed strike is a defined, quantified weapon the same way a battle axe or mace is. Certain abilities and feats just let you get more performance out of that character's unarmed strike. Natural weapons are another different, defined weapon. If you had a medium creature that had 1d4 dmg claws, that creature could choose to rake some guy with its claws doing 1d4 piercing/slashing damage and being considdered armed, or it could punch/kick/headbutt/knee/noogie the guy for 1d3 non-lethal bludgeoning damage and drawing an AoO if they attack an armed opponent. Choosing between the two different attacks is essentially the same as a fighter choosing to use his sword or his mace.</p><p></p><p></p><p>IceBear:</p><p>Thank you much. It's very nice of you to say. ^_^</p><p></p><p></p><p>Treebore:</p><p> I'm sorry to split hairs here, but the FAQ is a clairification of the rules as put down by the publishers. The two are one in the same. But as you said, we're all intelligent people, we're all fit to interpret the rules as we feel would fit best for our individual games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sejs, post: 1527608, member: 4910"] Camarath: Actually, you can, but as a secondary attack. So say for example I have an elven monk with a longsword. I can use the full attack action to get my normal alotment of monk attacks, including flurry, and then take a single attack with the longsword at the normal two-weapon fighting penalties (including the penalty for the secondary weapon not being light in this example... ouch). Or you can use the longsword as your primary weapon, getting a single secondary attack with your unarmed strike. What you [i]cannot[/i] do is use the longsword as your primary weapon, and flurry with your unarmed strike as a secondary attack. Basically if you want to get multiple attacks with a secondary weapon, you need to take the improved/greater two-weapon fighting feats. Right. Unarmed strike is a defined, quantified weapon the same way a battle axe or mace is. Certain abilities and feats just let you get more performance out of that character's unarmed strike. Natural weapons are another different, defined weapon. If you had a medium creature that had 1d4 dmg claws, that creature could choose to rake some guy with its claws doing 1d4 piercing/slashing damage and being considdered armed, or it could punch/kick/headbutt/knee/noogie the guy for 1d3 non-lethal bludgeoning damage and drawing an AoO if they attack an armed opponent. Choosing between the two different attacks is essentially the same as a fighter choosing to use his sword or his mace. IceBear: Thank you much. It's very nice of you to say. ^_^ Treebore: I'm sorry to split hairs here, but the FAQ is a clairification of the rules as put down by the publishers. The two are one in the same. But as you said, we're all intelligent people, we're all fit to interpret the rules as we feel would fit best for our individual games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
lycanthrope monk - flurry with natural attacks?
Top