My players are going to hand over Ragesian Case/Book to Lyceum mages and they are _really_ interested about what they have risked their lives about. After all, it is entire book full of secrets... except as written, it seems to be composed from 2 sentences.
"We have finally deciphered Lord of the Rings trilogy. First part is about some adventurers having adventures, second part mentioned a ring, but I'm not a jewelsmith, so I cannot tell more".
I'm probably going to describe a lot more about first part of the book - not the effect of the Scourge and not a location, but probably a lot of the process itself. It might lessen impact of certain discoveries in book 8, but I think that it is acceptable. But what about second part - how much is really there about triliths? Is there enough for players to make a connection between Fire Forest encounters and what is mentioned in book? Won't saying too much spoil some critical suprises in next modules?
"We have finally deciphered Lord of the Rings trilogy. First part is about some adventurers having adventures, second part mentioned a ring, but I'm not a jewelsmith, so I cannot tell more".
I'm probably going to describe a lot more about first part of the book - not the effect of the Scourge and not a location, but probably a lot of the process itself. It might lessen impact of certain discoveries in book 8, but I think that it is acceptable. But what about second part - how much is really there about triliths? Is there enough for players to make a connection between Fire Forest encounters and what is mentioned in book? Won't saying too much spoil some critical suprises in next modules?
