Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Neo" data-source="post: 890615" data-attributes="member: 4139">Well I'd agree a device needs be something that can be stolen, lost ro destroyed and Wolverines skeleton can have all those things done to it... however nowhere under the device flaw or in any of the released M&M material is any example given that the device must be easy for any of these things to be done to it.  In fact the main thing about a device is seemingly just that, that is is a device and not the hero, which is why I used it as I did.I'd disagree, but as you say later each to thier own <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  But nowhere is any example or suggestion provided that "any old joe" or equivelant should be able to take somethign with the device flaw.  but it is "feasibly" possible for anyone with the means or know how to remove the Adamantium grafts from Logans skeleton so it still falls within this criteria from a certain point of view.He didn't seem much different agreed, but could be wailed on more, and his claws broke which is something his adamantium ones never did.  But then why would his PL have to be any different?  He has paid for the skeleton and as with any device that is paid for in points it can thereby be replaced in some fashion, for logan the rationale of this is his natural mutations compensating... much as other senses compensate for the loss of one such as when people go blind or deaf.  It is only devices that are not paid for in points that are one shot affairs.</blockquote>

Verification