Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Axelos" data-source="post: 904358" data-attributes="member: 4012">Hmm...yeah, I was thinking that too, but my buddy (and player) thought it was okay.  I suspected he wanted me to leave it as is so he could take the PrC himself and kick ass!  So, now I've lowered the Hit Die down to a d8, changed the BAB progression to the cleric's, and delayed SR until 4th level.  This help?We'll try it that way, see how it works.Well, I left the SR in (though I delayed it until lvl 4 now), but I liked this idea enough that I put it in there too.  I don't know now if I've "paid" enough for it yet; lowering the Hit Die and BAB and reducing the Bane of Spellcasters damage, along with delaying the SR, is significant, but the PrC was already (as we all seem to agree) overpowered.  I also ditched the Spell Slayer ability that was giving me worries (but which you guys curiously did not mention), but as that is a 10th level ability, it still doesn't even out since the dispel magic ability comes at a much lower level than that.  Any thoughts?  Do I need to "pay" a little more for the dispel magic, or have the changes I've already made brought the PrC down enough that the dispel is okay?Well...okay, we'll try that.  I actually originally thought that, since this PrC was not exactly designed for rogues, a little bonus for rogues who did decide to take this path would be that they would be the only mage hunters who could deal with magical traps.  For now, though, I'll follow your suggestion.  I can always take it back out!All these changes are now reflected in the PrC description in the first post.  All comments are welcome!</blockquote>

Verification