Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6173965" data-attributes="member: 37579">It's one thing to have a party of subclass variants of classic familiar classes. While subclasses grant differences there are also familiarities.  It's another thing to have an entire party of new classes. Where none of the characters are recognizable or doing familiar things. An entire party of strangers.The slippery slope logical fallacy is not automatic. It is dependent on the subject. Wild mages and the like are just as valid. Why only make an exception for the most recent of classes?They've introduced eight classes in four years. We saw eight new classes in the first year of 3.5e. Paizo had to the sorcerer: Pathfinder was designed to be backwards compatible with 3.5e. But it's worth noting how much of an identity Paizo gave sorcerers. Much more than the class saw in 4e. It's a pity WotC can't use those ideas.</blockquote>