Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6175112" data-attributes="member: 2525">Why? Were you confused? What was unclear about it?Sure, but the need to put that information in there regardless of whether the class is a sub-class or its own thing.&nbsp; So, what's your objection to doing it this way?Naw, obviously these sub-classes come in a supplement of their own, and the other classes will eventually get a lot of sub-classes in supplement books too.&nbsp; Psion is not going to be in the Player's Handbook.Naw you don't post the chart over and over.&nbsp; I am saying the main mage chart is labelled much more generically than it is now, and the sub-classes simply fill in the generic labels for each sub-class.&nbsp; So no chart, just a list of which class abilities they get (labelled #1, #2, #3, etc..).&nbsp; I am sure there would be a standardized format created to quickly indicate what goes where.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6175112, member: 2525"] Why? Were you confused? What was unclear about it? Sure, but the need to put that information in there regardless of whether the class is a sub-class or its own thing. So, what's your objection to doing it this way? Naw, obviously these sub-classes come in a supplement of their own, and the other classes will eventually get a lot of sub-classes in supplement books too. Psion is not going to be in the Player's Handbook. Naw you don't post the chart over and over. I am saying the main mage chart is labelled much more generically than it is now, and the sub-classes simply fill in the generic labels for each sub-class. So no chart, just a list of which class abilities they get (labelled #1, #2, #3, etc..). I am sure there would be a standardized format created to quickly indicate what goes where. [/QUOTE]

Verification